Encyclopedia of Polymers and Composites 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-37179-0_29-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymorphism and Melting in Crystalline Polyethylene and Alkanes: Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the quiescent MD simulations of the entangled C 1000 H 2002 melt [50], the disengagement time τ d was determined as 5270 ns, the number of entanglements per chain) Z (via the Z1 code [63]) was 12.9, and the fully trans conformation chain end-to-end distance was 1290.2 Å. Toda [68] measured a melting point (T m ) of 398-403 K for quiescently grown single crystals of a linear PE with molar mass 13 600 g/mol, which is fairly close to the C 1000 H 2002 (M w = 14 002 g/mol) linear PE examined herein. Although it has thus far been impossible to determine a precise T m range for quiescent PE systems via MD, the accrued evidence to date suggests that a viable range would be 385-400 K [37,41,44,45,69]. Hence, the simulated melt temperature (450 K) used in this study is likely greater than 50 K above the values of T m as determined via experiment and equilibrium MD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…From the quiescent MD simulations of the entangled C 1000 H 2002 melt [50], the disengagement time τ d was determined as 5270 ns, the number of entanglements per chain) Z (via the Z1 code [63]) was 12.9, and the fully trans conformation chain end-to-end distance was 1290.2 Å. Toda [68] measured a melting point (T m ) of 398-403 K for quiescently grown single crystals of a linear PE with molar mass 13 600 g/mol, which is fairly close to the C 1000 H 2002 (M w = 14 002 g/mol) linear PE examined herein. Although it has thus far been impossible to determine a precise T m range for quiescent PE systems via MD, the accrued evidence to date suggests that a viable range would be 385-400 K [37,41,44,45,69]. Hence, the simulated melt temperature (450 K) used in this study is likely greater than 50 K above the values of T m as determined via experiment and equilibrium MD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As seen in Figure , the temperature of the transition from the β to the condis phase in MD simulations ( T C ∼ 650 K) is approximately 2 times higher than the temperature where the maximal electrocaloric effect is experimentally observed for terpolymers ( T ∼ 300 K). Such a discrepancy in the MD prediction of the first-order phase transition temperature is known in the polymer literature and is partly attributed to the small time scale achieved in the MD simulation . That is, the expansion of the system with a subsequent phase transition requires a very long MD simulation time if the temperature is not much higher than the actual transition temperature.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a discrepancy in the MD prediction of the first-order phase transition temperature is known in the polymer literature and is partly attributed to the small time scale achieved in the MD simulation. 41 That is, the expansion of the system with a subsequent phase transition requires a very long MD simulation time if the temperature is not much higher than the actual transition temperature. Consequently, when heated, the system remains in the metastable β phase for a long time until the temperature reaches a high value, sufficient for a rapid transition to the condis phase.…”
Section: Model and Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polymorphism of PE has been studied by molecular modeling and all‐atom MD simulations based on experimental results . A recent all‐atom MD simulation studied the anomalous chain mobility in the condis phase of PE .…”
Section: Current Advances and The Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of the reported simulations studying polymer crystallization are based on models ignoring some molecular details to boost simulations, resulting in faster crystallization but incorrect crystalline structure. So far, the reported simulations of polymorphism in polymers are limited as few studies of PE using all‐atom models, of iPP using fine united‐atom or all‐atom models, and of molecular modelings of specific polymers with experimental data …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%