2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01566.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymorphism and hemophilia A causing inversions in distal Xq28: a complex picture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, int22h-1 and int22h-2 sequences were reported to display the same orientation, 17 which may cause, theoretically, highly deleterious 0.5 Mb deletions or duplications in the case of recombination between misaligned sister chromatids or homologous chromosomes. It has been suggested that they are either extremely rare or nonexistent 13,18,19 and could cause problems in mutation testing in HA. 20 However, a very recent The size of amplicons corresponds to the sum of the distance between primer pairs and the length of the tail added to the locus-specific primer pairs for PCR amplification (30 bp in total).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, int22h-1 and int22h-2 sequences were reported to display the same orientation, 17 which may cause, theoretically, highly deleterious 0.5 Mb deletions or duplications in the case of recombination between misaligned sister chromatids or homologous chromosomes. It has been suggested that they are either extremely rare or nonexistent 13,18,19 and could cause problems in mutation testing in HA. 20 However, a very recent The size of amplicons corresponds to the sum of the distance between primer pairs and the length of the tail added to the locus-specific primer pairs for PCR amplification (30 bp in total).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1E), who is expected to carry already the recently proposed polymorphic, nonpathogenic inversion (step 1 in Fig. 2) as a prerequisite for the int22h2-related inversion (Bagnall et al, 2005). Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Such complex rearrangements are probably facilitated by the higher flexibility of the telomeric end of the X chromosome in the absence of a second pairing X-chromosome during male meiosis (Rossiter et al, 1994). Grey boxes indicate the homologous regions flanking the extragenic copies int22h2 and int22h3 that facilitate intragenic homologous recombination resulting in a polymorphic, non-pathogenic inversion (step 1) with int22h2 consequently located distal and in opposite orientation to int22h1 (Bagnall et al, 2005). The proposed formation and stabilization of a loop structure by inverted repeat elements (Alu and LINE, represented by triangles indicating the orientation) allowed templating of the MPP1 fragment insertion in F8 intron 15 (step 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that only one of the repeats should participate in F8 inversion events, but both types of inversion are known. This observation led to the suggestion of an inversion polymorphism that involved the two distal repeats [33,34] and which has subsequently been verified (Figure 2) [35]. The frequency of the two alleles in the population might explain the long-standing mystery of why one of the distal repeats is far more frequently involved in inversions than the other.…”
Section: Genomic Disordersmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…int22h-1 lies in intron 22 of the F8 gene, whereas int22h-2 and int22h-3 lie within the arms of a large inverted repeat, which are separated by a $70 kb spacer (thin black line). (a) and (b) represent alleles that differ as a result of an inversion, possibly created by nonallelic homologous recombination between the arms of this repeat [33].…”
Section: Complex Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%