1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02338802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymorphism and concerted evolution in a tandemly repeated gene family: 5S ribosomal DNA in diploid and allopolyploid cottons

Abstract: 5S RNA genes and their nontranscribed spacers are tandemly repeated in plant genomes at one or more chromosomal loci. To facilitate an understanding of the forces that govern 5S rDNA evolution, copy-number estimation and DNA sequencing were conducted for a phylogenetically well-characterized set of 16 diploid species of cotton (Gossypium) and 4 species representing allopolyploid derivatives of the diploids. Copy number varies over twentyfold in the genus, from approximately 1,000 to 20,000 copies/2C genome. Wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

16
202
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
16
202
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data revealed: (i) the length of basic unit of the S-genome family of tobacco is the same as the length of basic unit in N. sylvestris, likewise the length of basic unit of the T-genome family of tobacco is the same as the full length unit in N. tomentosiformis; (ii) the T-genome family of tobacco and N. tomentosiformis 5S units have the same GC-rich sub-region that is absent in the S-genome family and N. sylvestris; and (iii) the non-coding spacer of S-genome family has high sequence similarity to the spacer of N. sylvestris while the non-coding spacer of Tgenome family has high sequence similarity to N. tomentosiformis. This organization of 5S units in tobacco in which parental 5S units can be distinguished by length polymorphisms resembles other well-studied plant allopolyploids in the genera Triticum (Scoles et al, 1988) and Gossypium (Cronn et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The data revealed: (i) the length of basic unit of the S-genome family of tobacco is the same as the length of basic unit in N. sylvestris, likewise the length of basic unit of the T-genome family of tobacco is the same as the full length unit in N. tomentosiformis; (ii) the T-genome family of tobacco and N. tomentosiformis 5S units have the same GC-rich sub-region that is absent in the S-genome family and N. sylvestris; and (iii) the non-coding spacer of S-genome family has high sequence similarity to the spacer of N. sylvestris while the non-coding spacer of Tgenome family has high sequence similarity to N. tomentosiformis. This organization of 5S units in tobacco in which parental 5S units can be distinguished by length polymorphisms resembles other well-studied plant allopolyploids in the genera Triticum (Scoles et al, 1988) and Gossypium (Cronn et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Thus interlocus gene conversion has not occurred for 5S rDNA as it did for 18-26S rDNA. Similarly, interlocus homogenisation at 18-26S rDNA, but not 5S rDNA, has been observed in allopolyploid Gossypium species (Cronn et al, 1996), suggesting similar evolutionary patterns.…”
Section: Evolution Of 5s Repeats At the Unit Levelmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Gossypium genus is an attractive model for studying the genetic changes associated with polyploid evolution, with a natural interspecific cross between taxa that remain extant followed by chromosome doubling having spawned five extant tetraploid species. Substantial divergence among the diploid genomes provides a backdrop for polyploid cotton evolution-for example, a twofold difference in genome size between the A and D genome progenitors is due largely to differential accumulation of retroelements in the A genome (Zhao et al, 1995Grover et al, 2007) and biased accumulation of small deletions in the D genome (Grover et al, 2007), with intergenomic exchange of these elements following polyploid formation (Wendel et al, 1995;Cronn et al, 1996;Hanson et al, 1998;Zhao et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%