In this study the role of cytochrome P450 2D (CYP2D) in the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship of (Ï©)-tramadol [(Ï©)-T] has been explored in rats. Male Wistar rats were infused with (Ï©)-T in the absence of and during pretreatment with a reversible CYP2D inhibitor quinine (Q), determining plasma concentrations of Q, (Ï©)-T, and (Ï©)-O-demethyltramadol [(Ï©)-M1], and measuring antinociception. Pharmacokinetics of (Ï©)-M1, but not (Ï©)-T, was affected by Q pretreatment: early after the start of (Ï©)-T infusion, levels of (Ï©)-M1 were significantly lower (P Ïœ 0.05). However, at later times during Q infusion those levels increased continuously, exceeding the values found in animals that did not receive the inhibitor. These results suggest that CYP2D is involved in the formation and elimination of (Ï©)-M1. In fact, results from another experiment where (Ï©)-M1 was given in the presence and in absence of Q showed that (Ï©)-M1 elimination clearance (CL ME0 ) was significantly lower (P Ïœ 0.05) in animals receiving Q. Inhibition of both (Ï©)-M1 formation clearance (CL M10 ) and CL ME0 were modeled by an inhibitory E MAX model, and the estimates (relative standard error) of the maximum degree of inhibition (E MAX ) and IC 50 , plasma concentration of Q eliciting half of E MAX for CL M10 and CL ME0 , were 0.94 (0.04), 97 (0.51) ng/ml, and 48 (0.42) ng/ml, respectively. The modeling of the time course of antinociception showed that the contribution of (Ï©)-T was negligible and (Ï©)-M1 was responsible for the observed effects, which depend linearly on (Ï©)-M1 effect site concentrations. Therefore, the CYP2D activity is a major determinant of the antinociception elicited after (Ï©)-T administration.Tramadol (T) is a safe and effective analgesic used during the last two decades in the treatment of several types of pain (Rhoda et al., 1993;Raffa et al., 1995). Despite its long-term use, the understanding and prediction of the time course of its pharmacological effects are still hampered by the presence of active metabolites and the coexistence of opioid and nonopioid mechanisms. In fact, T is administered as a racemic mixture of two enantiomers, (Ï©)-T and (ÏȘ)-T, which are metabolized in the liver forming, among others, the two main, respectively. Data from literature suggest that (Ï©)-enantiomers show opioid properties, while (ÏȘ)-enantiomers are able to inhibit the uptake of norepinephrine. This duality of action makes T an atypical opioid (Raffa et al., 1992;Raffa and Friderichs, 1996).Recently the antinociceptive properties of the two active metabolites of T, (Ï©)-M1 and (ÏȘ)-M1, have been evaluated in the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (pk/pd) perspective in the rat. The results showed that (Ï©)-M1, in accord with its -opioid receptor agonist properties (Lai et al., 1996), was able to produce maximum antinociception in the tail-flick test; however, when (ÏȘ)-M1, a monoamine re-uptake inhibitor (Frink et al., 1996), was given alone, no significant effects were found . However, Garrido et al., 2000 showed that in the presence of ...