Biomaterials Engineering and Devices: Human Applications 2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-59259-197-8_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymers in the Oral Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…D was calculated from the reduced sorption curve (Fig. 7), which is ( m t − m 0 )/( m infinity − m 0 ) versus ( t 1/2 /thickness), based on the following equation51, 52: The D that is supposedly measured by the experiment results from the diffusion down the concentration gradient formed inside the solid after the liquid has adsorbed and then dissolved into the surface layer of the specimen. D for PEG was 40 times larger than D for N9 ( D was 1.5 × 10 −9 and 0.038 × 10 −9 cm 2 /s for PEG and N9, respectively) because of the greater size of N9 compared to PEG.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D was calculated from the reduced sorption curve (Fig. 7), which is ( m t − m 0 )/( m infinity − m 0 ) versus ( t 1/2 /thickness), based on the following equation51, 52: The D that is supposedly measured by the experiment results from the diffusion down the concentration gradient formed inside the solid after the liquid has adsorbed and then dissolved into the surface layer of the specimen. D for PEG was 40 times larger than D for N9 ( D was 1.5 × 10 −9 and 0.038 × 10 −9 cm 2 /s for PEG and N9, respectively) because of the greater size of N9 compared to PEG.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%