Bone Repair Biomaterials 2009
DOI: 10.1533/9781845696610.2.231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymers for bone repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33 Furthermore, since the migration of radicals is not a random walk process, Dr. Spiess 34 introduced a correction to the activation energy, which gave a value of approximately 40 h to cross a crystal. Although with the advancement of processes and technologies, the dimensions of UHMWPE crystallites have exceeded 25 nm and almost 50 nm, 35 compared to the long-term failure time (approximately five years 36 ), the time for free radical migration and reaction is much shorter. Consequently, the residual free radicals in the crystalline region may not be the primary cause of the longterm failure of artificial joints.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Furthermore, since the migration of radicals is not a random walk process, Dr. Spiess 34 introduced a correction to the activation energy, which gave a value of approximately 40 h to cross a crystal. Although with the advancement of processes and technologies, the dimensions of UHMWPE crystallites have exceeded 25 nm and almost 50 nm, 35 compared to the long-term failure time (approximately five years 36 ), the time for free radical migration and reaction is much shorter. Consequently, the residual free radicals in the crystalline region may not be the primary cause of the longterm failure of artificial joints.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%