1973
DOI: 10.1002/app.1973.070170517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymerization in an electrodeless glow discharge. II. Olefinic monomers

Abstract: SynopsisThe rates of polymer deposition from various olefinic monomers in an electrodeless glow discharge were studied. The previously found empirical relationship (with styrene in part I) between the rate of polymer deposition R, the monomer pressure PN, and gas pressure p , in a steady-state flow system (i.e., R = a(pai)* [l + b(p,)], R being nearly independent of the discharge power) was also found with all monomers investigated. (The effect of gas was examined with nitrogen in this study.) However, it was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(1 reference statement)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been pointed out that this process is a “pulsed plasma‐initiated chemical (radical) gas phase copolymerization”, which strongly contrasts with the simple, so‐called “plasma copolymerization”. This “old” process of plasma copolymerization also enforces the reaction of improper chemically inert monomers as demonstrated by Schüler et al and Yasuda 37–39. The most significant disadvantages of the “old” continuous‐wave (cw) plasma copolymerization process are: Nearly complete monomer molecule fragmentation into atoms and small fragments because of the excess of energy consumed per monomer during residence in the plasma zone (Figure 3, cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It has been pointed out that this process is a “pulsed plasma‐initiated chemical (radical) gas phase copolymerization”, which strongly contrasts with the simple, so‐called “plasma copolymerization”. This “old” process of plasma copolymerization also enforces the reaction of improper chemically inert monomers as demonstrated by Schüler et al and Yasuda 37–39. The most significant disadvantages of the “old” continuous‐wave (cw) plasma copolymerization process are: Nearly complete monomer molecule fragmentation into atoms and small fragments because of the excess of energy consumed per monomer during residence in the plasma zone (Figure 3, cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In case of the plasma polymerization, ethylbenzene polymerizes and its polymer deposition rate is similar to that of styrene (2).…”
Section: A Glow-discharge Polymerizationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Neiswender and Blaustein [59] were the first to introduce an energy related dose factor that allowed for a better comparing between different plasma conditions. Yasuda adopted and improved this model to what is known today as the Yasuda factor [60,61]. The Yasuda factor itself is a combination of the reactor geometry ( ) and the normalised binding energy of the monomer ( ) [62].…”
Section: Plasma Polymerisationmentioning
confidence: 99%