2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2016.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymeric polymorphs and a monomer of pseudohalide incorporated Cu(II) complexes of 2,4-dichlorido-6-((2-(dimethylamino)ethylimino)methyl)phenol]: Crystal structures and spectroscopic behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both copper(II) complexes exhibit axial features [(g || = 2.271, g ┴ = 2.065) and (g || = 2.266, g ┴ = 2.053)] as well as well-resolved hyperfine splitting in parallel and perpendicular region due to the interaction of the odd electron with the nuclear spin ( 63,65 Cu, I = 3/2). For these tetracoordinate complexes 3 and 4 , the fact that g|| is greater than g ┴ suggests a distorted square-planar structure consistent with the X-ray structural analysis [ 48 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Both copper(II) complexes exhibit axial features [(g || = 2.271, g ┴ = 2.065) and (g || = 2.266, g ┴ = 2.053)] as well as well-resolved hyperfine splitting in parallel and perpendicular region due to the interaction of the odd electron with the nuclear spin ( 63,65 Cu, I = 3/2). For these tetracoordinate complexes 3 and 4 , the fact that g|| is greater than g ┴ suggests a distorted square-planar structure consistent with the X-ray structural analysis [ 48 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Two examples of helical trans ‐μ 1,1 chains with Cu(II) are already reported by our group and this complex is structurally similar except for the greater spacing of the alternate teeth (7.4498 Å) in the zipper‐like formation (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It had reported that g was less than 2.3 for covalent character and greater than 2.3 for ionic character of the metal ligand bond in the complexes [16]. According to Hathaway [37,38], the parameter G, determined as G = (g −2) / (g ⊥ −2), if G was greater than 4, the exchange interaction may be negligible; however, if G is less than 4, a considerable exchange interaction was indicated in the solid complex [39,40]. The calculated G value for the Cu(II) complex was 3.2, indicative of considerable exchange interaction between the copper centers in the solid [40].…”
Section: Electron Spin Resonance Spectrum Of Cu(ii) Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%