2016
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2016/22462.9010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymerase Chain Reaction: An Important Tool for Early Diagnosis of Leptospirosis Cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA of suggestive cultures with turbidity equivalent to 0.5 in the McFarland scale (1.5 x 10 8 bacteria/mL) was extracted through silica gel column with DNeasy Blood & Tissue ® kit (Qiagen ® , Germany), following the manufacturer instructions. The DNA was kept frozen at -20 °C until use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA of suggestive cultures with turbidity equivalent to 0.5 in the McFarland scale (1.5 x 10 8 bacteria/mL) was extracted through silica gel column with DNeasy Blood & Tissue ® kit (Qiagen ® , Germany), following the manufacturer instructions. The DNA was kept frozen at -20 °C until use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positivity of SAT and ELISA IgM for all 67 sera was 48 (71.6%) and 39 (58.2%), respectively. In the case of the unavailability of the reference serology test (MAT), ELISA IgM and SAT can detect leptospirosis at the acute and convalescent stages, with high sensitivity as reported (2,4,19,23,24). Therefore, we suggest that patients who had negative results by ELISA IgM and SAT might have not leptospirosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…De Abreu Fonseca et al compared PCR with ELISA IgM, and reported that ELISA IgM had more sensitivity; however, PCR was most sensitive in initial sera samples presenting no specific antibodies detectable by any of the serological methods tested (18). Therefore, it was suggested that the positivity of the diagnosis increased when PCR was used with serological tests (18,23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targeting housekeeping genes that are included in all species of Leptospira (16S rrs , secY , or gyrB ) or pathogenic species-specific genes ( lipL32 , lfb1 , or lig ) have been used as targets for PCR-based diagnosis. 2 10 11 12 13 The sensitivity and specificity of PCR has been reported as 52.7% and 97.2%, respectively, compared to MAT (49.8% and 98.8%, respectively). 3 PCR for the detection of pathogenic Leptospira spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%