2012
DOI: 10.1002/app.37980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymer nanocomposite‐based shielding against diagnostic X‐rays

Abstract: Lead is commonly used in medical radiology departments as a shielding material. Lead‐based protective materials are also used by clinical personnel during X‐ray image‐guided interventional radiology (IVR) procedures. However, lead is extremely toxic and prolonged exposure to it can result in serious health concerns. Polymer composites, on the other hand, can be designed to be lead‐free in addition to being lightweight, conformable, cost effective, and potentially capable of significantly attenuating X‐rays. Na… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, high Z elements may not be able to block all types of radiations, particularly the emissions of neutrons in space or nuclear laboratories. Also, they are restricted in some applications due to the heavy weight, bulky space, and toxicity (lead) [1][2][3]. Therefore, non-toxic ''lead-free'' filler-reinforced polymer composite for its lightweight, workability, and ability to effectively attenuate radiation has aroused great public interest in many areas, especially in medical treatment, nuclear plant and mobile nuclear devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, high Z elements may not be able to block all types of radiations, particularly the emissions of neutrons in space or nuclear laboratories. Also, they are restricted in some applications due to the heavy weight, bulky space, and toxicity (lead) [1][2][3]. Therefore, non-toxic ''lead-free'' filler-reinforced polymer composite for its lightweight, workability, and ability to effectively attenuate radiation has aroused great public interest in many areas, especially in medical treatment, nuclear plant and mobile nuclear devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, non-toxic ''lead-free'' filler-reinforced polymer composite for its lightweight, workability, and ability to effectively attenuate radiation has aroused great public interest in many areas, especially in medical treatment, nuclear plant and mobile nuclear devices. For example, the ethylene-propylenediene rubber (EPDM)/low density polyethylene (LDPE) mixed with boron carbide has been widely used for neutron shielding [4], and the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) blended with bismuth oxide (BiO) nanoparticles used to shield against X-ray with the voltage range from 40 to 150 kV [3]. But their poor mechanical strength, low thermal stability and radiation resistance make them not suitable for a long-term use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Percentage X-ray attenuation of the matrix and G1-25, G1-2.5, G2-25 and G2-2.5 nanocomposite blocks as a function of X-ray photon energy attenuation as the material under consideration under similar conditions of irradiation (Nambiar et al 2013;Scuderi et al 2006). Thus, it is a standard reference for non-lead shielding material (Nambiar et al 2013;Scuderi et al 2006). The lead equivalence of nanocomposites containing G1 and G2 nanoparticles (25 wt%) at X-ray photon energy of 40 keV is found to be 0.094 and 0.08 mm, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the value is slightly higher than that of X-ray shielding fabrics. Nambiar et al [13] combine polydimethylsiloxane resins and 37.73 or 44.44 wt% of bismuth oxide (BO) nanopowders, and the X-ray shielding effect of two composite types at 50 kV are 85 % and 90 %, respectively. In this study, the X-ray shielding powder used in X-ray shielding fabric weigh 5 % to 20.83 %, and that used in double-layer X-ray shielding fabric is 26.92 wt%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%