2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymer–Nanocarbon Topological and Electronic Interface

Abstract: The electronic structure of semiconducting carbon nanotubes selected through polymer functionalization is routinely verified by measuring the spectral van Hove singularity signature under ultraclean vacuum conditions. Interpreting the effect of unperturbed polymer adsorption on the nanotube energetic bands in solvent media is experimentally challenging owing to solvent molecular crowding around the hybrid complex. Here, a liquid-based scanning tunneling microscope and spectroscope operating in a noise-free lab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absorption data demonstrate that the more planar polymers PNDITEG-TVT and PNDIC8TEG-TVT have a lower capability of dispersing (but not selecting for) s-SWCNT than the less planar PNDITEG-AH . The higher ability of PNDITEG-AH for dispersing s-SWCNT is likely a result of the twist in the head-to-head bithiophene moiety that favors a helical conformation for wrapping nanotubes. , The minor difference between PNDITEG-AH and PNDITEG-TVT indicates that inserting a vinylene linker into PNDITEG-AH (thus forming PNDITEG-TVT ) did not significantly sacrifice wrapping capability. Although the planar polymer PNDITEG-TVT is less prone to form a helical conformation to wrap s-SWCNT as compared with PNDITEG-AH , the extended π-conjugation gives rise to a strong π–π intermolecular interaction, which enhances π–π interaction between the polymer chains and the s-SWCNT. ,, Therefore, PNDITEG-TVT remains capable of wrapping the s-SWCNT, but the lower band gap compared to PNDITEG-AH should be beneficial to charge transport.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absorption data demonstrate that the more planar polymers PNDITEG-TVT and PNDIC8TEG-TVT have a lower capability of dispersing (but not selecting for) s-SWCNT than the less planar PNDITEG-AH . The higher ability of PNDITEG-AH for dispersing s-SWCNT is likely a result of the twist in the head-to-head bithiophene moiety that favors a helical conformation for wrapping nanotubes. , The minor difference between PNDITEG-AH and PNDITEG-TVT indicates that inserting a vinylene linker into PNDITEG-AH (thus forming PNDITEG-TVT ) did not significantly sacrifice wrapping capability. Although the planar polymer PNDITEG-TVT is less prone to form a helical conformation to wrap s-SWCNT as compared with PNDITEG-AH , the extended π-conjugation gives rise to a strong π–π intermolecular interaction, which enhances π–π interaction between the polymer chains and the s-SWCNT. ,, Therefore, PNDITEG-TVT remains capable of wrapping the s-SWCNT, but the lower band gap compared to PNDITEG-AH should be beneficial to charge transport.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are an excellent choice for nanoelectronic components. Further, CNT in combination with polymer in the ratio of 1:2 can also be used as electronic interfaces [18]. Carbon nanotubes and graphene are best suited elements for the manufacture of flexible electronic devices [19].…”
Section: Carbon Nanotube (Cnt) Interconnectsmentioning
confidence: 99%