Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.coche.2018.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymer adsorption on rough surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, it has been reasoned that in proximity to rough substrates the structural relaxation time τ should increase [9,10], because of the larger number of contacts with the substrate. This phenomenon mimics an increment in interfacial interactions (larger ρ) [11,12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Similarly, it has been reasoned that in proximity to rough substrates the structural relaxation time τ should increase [9,10], because of the larger number of contacts with the substrate. This phenomenon mimics an increment in interfacial interactions (larger ρ) [11,12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Thus, both CS2 and SQ topographical patterns provided both structural stability and adsorption sites, thereby ensuring higher bioavailability for tissue engineering applications. the protein can promote increased adsorption because of the proximity of residues with the surface curvature, as compared to a smooth surface [38]. Although SQ promoted increased adsorption, the homodimer presented a more unfolded configuration than the simulations performed on CS2, which can explain the losses of the secondary structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The CS2 pattern was able to increase protein adsorption while preserving the structure of the adsorbed monomer. According to Venkatakrishnan and Kuppa [ 38 ], protein-surface interaction is directly affected by the surface roughness, in which topologies with a similar format as the protein can promote increased adsorption because of the proximity of residues with the surface curvature, as compared to a smooth surface [ 38 ]. Although SQ promoted increased adsorption, the homodimer presented a more unfolded configuration than the simulations performed on CS2, which can explain the losses of the secondary structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, only a few researchers have endeavored to explore the effect of surface geometric heterogeneity on gas adsorption via molecular simulation, although atomistic modeling provides a feasible microscopic approach to describing pore surfaces more realistically . Most of their studies have shown that the surface geometric heterogeneity can notably affect gas adsorption. ,,,,, Bojan and Steele, for example, compared the adsorption of krypton on a steplike graphitic surface with that on a flat graphitic surface by molecular dynamics simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the models in the second category, the surface fractal dimension could have been used as an appropriate parameter to quantify random heterogeneity. However, to the best of our knowledge, few published studies have investigated gas adsorption on atomic-scale fractal surfaces by molecular simulation. , Systematically evaluating the effect of the atomic-scale surface fractal on gas adsorption remains an open research question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%