“…In terms of the functional merit of iron over bronze, Muhly argued most prominently that technical factors ascertained the pioneering role of Cyprus in the transition to its utilitarian use. Relying on the metallurgical studies of a few exceptionally well-preserved artefacts from Amathus, Idalion and Lapithos, he emphasised the process of hardening as the key factor behind the success of Cypriot iron smithing as early as the beginning of the twelfth century bc (Muhly et al 1985, 68; Muhly 2006, 21–3; Muhly and Kassianidou 2012, 134; see also Maddin 1982, 303; 2011, 204–7; Pickles and Peltenburg 1998, 84; Sanidas et al 2016, 281). Based on an assumption of a clear association between Cyprus and the early iron objects (iron knives with bronze rivets, knives fully made of iron, and slightly later also iron swords) found in Euboea and Crete dating to the eleventh and tenth centuries bc , Muhly (2006, 28–31) argued that it was not just these novel and also highly demanded products that were traded, but also the corresponding technologies (Muhly and Kassianidou 2012, 125; cf.…”