2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polygyny and female breeding failure reduce effective population size in the lekking Gunnison sage-grouse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
40
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Excluding these populations, we obtained a ratio (0.34) very similar to the one reported for other mammals (Frankham 1995). This ratio seems reasonable, given that Alpine ibex are highly polygynous, leading to a high variance in reproductive success of males and, in turn, to reduced Ne (Hoelzel 1999;Stiver et al 2008). However, it is possible that the Ne/ Nc ratio is biased upwards.…”
Section: Contemporary Effective Population Sizesupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Excluding these populations, we obtained a ratio (0.34) very similar to the one reported for other mammals (Frankham 1995). This ratio seems reasonable, given that Alpine ibex are highly polygynous, leading to a high variance in reproductive success of males and, in turn, to reduced Ne (Hoelzel 1999;Stiver et al 2008). However, it is possible that the Ne/ Nc ratio is biased upwards.…”
Section: Contemporary Effective Population Sizesupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In addition to variance introduced by the low precision of the Ne estimates (Nei and Tajima 1981;Waples 1989), other factors such as variance in family size or differences in sex ratio may also have contributed to the variation in Ne among populations. For example, some studies have reported an increased variance in reproductive success in larger populations (Ardren and Kapuscinski 2003;Hedrick 2005;Stiver et al 2008). Additionally, hunting schemes and intensities differ among ibex populations, and this might affect Ne differently (Ryman et al 1981;Allendorf et al 2008).…”
Section: Contemporary Effective Population Sizementioning
confidence: 97%
“…This has been demonstrated both theoretically [7][8][9][10][11][12] and experimentally [13]. Other factors that affect the variance in reproductive success, and thus N e , are multiple paternity within broods [14], population subdivision [15] and variance in female fecundity [16][17][18]. Nunney [16] examined different types of variation in female fecundity and found that consistent individual effects decreased the effective population size more than random effects or age-related effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Life history traits such as a lek breeding behaviour, which all Tympanuchus grouse possess, evolved in a landscape that allowed large contiguous populations, yet when the species is forced to occupy small isolated fragments, such traits can become a negative attribute by further suppressing the effective population size and increasing the rate of genetic diversity loss due to drift (e.g. Johnson et al 2004;Stiver et al 2008). Previous work quantifying mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) genetic variation within the heath hen population 30 years before its extinction documented lower haplotype diversity compared to greater prairie-chicken (T. c. pinnatus) populations in the midwest U.S. that had also experienced a genetic bottleneck (Johnson & Dunn 2006; see also Palkovacs et al 2004).…”
Section: Pre-extinction Genetic Bottleneckmentioning
confidence: 99%