1950
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1950.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polygenic variability in chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster obtained from the wild

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1953
1953
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was reflected in a decrease in the number of ascospores produced, an increase in the number of aborted ascospores and asci, and a decrease in the number of mature perithecia produced. This decrease in fertility is similar to that obtained by selecting for differences in bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster (Mather and Wigan 1942;Harrisson and Mather 1950) and can probably be regarded as a correlated response. The mass culture lines set up to try to improve the fertility of the low line gave an increase in fertility, yet no significant drop in mean ascospore length.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This was reflected in a decrease in the number of ascospores produced, an increase in the number of aborted ascospores and asci, and a decrease in the number of mature perithecia produced. This decrease in fertility is similar to that obtained by selecting for differences in bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster (Mather and Wigan 1942;Harrisson and Mather 1950) and can probably be regarded as a correlated response. The mass culture lines set up to try to improve the fertility of the low line gave an increase in fertility, yet no significant drop in mean ascospore length.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Sex difference has already been shown to vary with slight genetic alterations (Harrison and Mather, 1950), but never to the extent of that shown by the LM lines ( fig. 3).…”
Section: Sex Differences In Chaeta Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recombinants, being more extreme, were favoured in his high and low selection lines. Harrison & Mather (1950) showed that variability is essential for a response to selection, since little or no response occurred in homozygotes, but considerable response occurred in heterozygotes presumably because of recombination and rearrangement of polygenic combinations.…”
Section: Experimental Evidence For Polygenic Balance ( I ) Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%