2015
DOI: 10.1177/0269881115584470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polygenic risk scores in imaging genetics: Usefulness and applications

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. After the first GWAS studies in schizophrenia it soon became apparent there were no common variants that had a large influence on risk, but rather that there were thousands of variants of very small effect that together acted to increase or reduce Ferreira et al., 2008;Sklar et al., 2008;Schulze et al., 2009;Scott et al., 2009;Smith et al., 2009;Athanasiu et al., 2010;Tesli et al., 2011), th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the main advantage of the polygenic risk score method is that it provides a quantitative measure of the polygenic load of each study participant without relying on their genetic distance from an affected proband. Moreover, the PGR-BD allows modelling the cumulative effect of multiple risk-variants for BD and is known to explain a greater proportion of phenotypic variance that single riks-alleles (International Schizophrenia Consortium et al, 2009, Dima and Breen, 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, the main advantage of the polygenic risk score method is that it provides a quantitative measure of the polygenic load of each study participant without relying on their genetic distance from an affected proband. Moreover, the PGR-BD allows modelling the cumulative effect of multiple risk-variants for BD and is known to explain a greater proportion of phenotypic variance that single riks-alleles (International Schizophrenia Consortium et al, 2009, Dima and Breen, 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response, the polygenic risk (PGR) score method has been developed to quantify the extent to which common risk-variants may collectively capture variation in susceptibility to disease (International Schizophrenia Consortium et al, 2009). The PGR score for BD (PGR-BD) is calculated in each individual by aggregating variation across GWAS loci nominally associated with BD into a quantitative score (International Schizophrenia Consortium et al, 2009, Dima and Breen, 2015), with the current PGR-BD explaining ~ 5% of the variance to BD (Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, 2013). Two previous studies have used the polygenic risk score method to examine the cumulative impact of BD-related risk-conferring SNPs on task-related brain activation during an emotional processing (Tesli et al, 2015) and a word generation task (Whalley et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…27,28 This pattern implies that restricting analyses to a small number of risk loci provides a weak signal of underlying genetic risk that is improved by aggregating effects across many loci. Our results might further explain discrepancies reported across exploratory GWAS studies of AD markers.…”
Section: (Pgrs) Discrimination Between Patients With Alzheimer Diseasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A polygenic risk score (PRS) 33 is an approximate measure of an individual’s common variant genetic propensity for a given disorder and, at a population level shows some predictive power 34 for case-control status. PRS approaches provide several potential routes to drug development, including identification of genetically associated endophenotypes and biomarkers.…”
Section: Precision Medicine For Psychiatry and Polygenic Risk Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%