To the Editor: We thank Long et al. for their positive comments on the novelty and the potential clinical impact of our recent study on the use of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) to infer causality between hepatic fat and carcinogenesis, and to predict hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in individuals with dysmetabolism and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). 1,2 As highlighted by Long et al., 2 the PRS prediction for HCC in a large European NAFLD cohort was largely superior to that of the single genetic risk variants. However, the AUC was relatively low (<0.7) and, in fact, we refrained from proposing the clinical use of PRS as a standalone diagnostic test. Additionally, in our study, PRS and classical risk factors were independently associated with HCC and together conferred a significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy compared to each of them alone. 1 We observed a non-linear relationship between PRS and HCC risk, and in line with previous data, a synergistic effect between PRS and severity of insulin resistance in determining liver disease. 1,3,4 Therefore, we identified the optimal thresholds to discriminate HCC risk and validated these thresholds in participants with obesity and type 2 diabetes from the UK Biobank cohort. In this population-based study, PRS alone had and AUROC of 0.70 for detecting HCC. A positive PRS test was observed in approximately 1 in 10 individuals and it was able to predict HCC with 90% specificity. We reasoned that, as part of the ability of a PRS to predict HCC is mediated by the life-long burden of genetic variants on liver damage, 1 the PRS may be optimal to identify young at-risk individuals for whom preventive measures and surveillance programs can be implemented long before cirrhosis development. 1 As Long et al. suggested, we now report the fraction of HCC variability explained by genetic predisposition to NAFLD in order to assess the relative burden compared to classical risk factors. The population attributable fraction (PAF) of cirrhosis and HCC accounted for by PRS compared to the single genetic variants in the UK Biobank population-based cohort is shown in Table 1. 5 Remarkably, genetic predisposition to NAFLD jointly accounted for 30.39% and 60.95% of cirrhosis and HCC variability, respectively (17.28 and 57.49% for the PRS). Considering HCC, this compares to 58.57% accounted for by male sex, and 33.35% and 41.78% by obesity and type 2 diabetes, respectively. It is important to bear in mind that sex, a major determinant of HCC risk, is also genetically determined, and that adiposity and type 2 diabetes also share a large inherited fraction predisposing to liver disease. 3 In our paper, the PRS was based on PNPLA3-TM6SF2-