2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyethylenimine modified ultrafine palladium nanocrystals on reduced graphene oxide for hexavalent chromium reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the turnover frequency (TOF = [product]/([catalytic active site] × t min ) was calculated as 28.9 mol Cr(VI) ·mol Redox –1 ·min –1 . The obtained value is 20–1000× higher than that of some of the Pd-based efficient catalytic systems, like polyethylenimine-Pd-nano (1.16 mol Cr(VI) ·mol Redox –1 ·min –1 ), Pd@Reduced graphene oxide (0.496 mol Cr(VI) ·mol Redox –1 ·min –1 ), Pd@Fe 3 O 4 –nanocellulose (0.256 mol Cr(VI) ·mol Redox –1 ·min –1 ), Pd@polyethylene sulfonate (0.117 mol Cr(VI) ·mol Redox –1 ·min –1 ), and Pd@Fe 3 O 4 -microsphere carbon (0.032 mol Cr(VI) ·mol Redox –1 ·min –1 ) (Table ). These results indicate a high-performance electrocatalytic reduction-based detoxification of the Cr­(VI) by this organic molecular redox species-modified electrode at an ambient temperature (25 ± 2 °C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the turnover frequency (TOF = [product]/([catalytic active site] × t min ) was calculated as 28.9 mol Cr(VI) ·mol Redox –1 ·min –1 . The obtained value is 20–1000× higher than that of some of the Pd-based efficient catalytic systems, like polyethylenimine-Pd-nano (1.16 mol Cr(VI) ·mol Redox –1 ·min –1 ), Pd@Reduced graphene oxide (0.496 mol Cr(VI) ·mol Redox –1 ·min –1 ), Pd@Fe 3 O 4 –nanocellulose (0.256 mol Cr(VI) ·mol Redox –1 ·min –1 ), Pd@polyethylene sulfonate (0.117 mol Cr(VI) ·mol Redox –1 ·min –1 ), and Pd@Fe 3 O 4 -microsphere carbon (0.032 mol Cr(VI) ·mol Redox –1 ·min –1 ) (Table ). These results indicate a high-performance electrocatalytic reduction-based detoxification of the Cr­(VI) by this organic molecular redox species-modified electrode at an ambient temperature (25 ± 2 °C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Since the electrocatalyst is not interfering with Cr(III) and dissolved oxygen species, experiments were carried out out using a single •min −1 . The obtained value is 20−1000× higher than that of some of the Pd-based efficient catalytic systems, like polyethylenimine-Pd-nano (1.16 mol Cr(VI) • mol Redox −1 •min −1 ), 70 Pd@Reduced graphene oxide (0.496 mol Cr(VI) •mol Redox −1 •min −1 ), 71 Pd@Fe 3 O 4 −nanocellulose (0.256 mol Cr(VI) •mol Redox −1…”
Section: Catalytic Active Sitementioning
confidence: 73%
“…8,[34][35][36][37][51][52][53][54][55] Heavy metal contamination of water is a major ecological concern, especially in industrial wastewater, where Cr(VI) is a major pollutant. [56][57][58] As per consensus, it is the second-most prevalent heavy metal contaminant in hazardous waste sites. 59 The mobility of Cr(VI) in water is high, and it is highly toxic, whereas Cr(III) has low mobility, is less toxic, and can create hydroxides that are insoluble.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heavy metal contamination of water is a major ecological concern, especially in industrial wastewater, where Cr(VI) is a major pollutant 56–58 . As per consensus, it is the second‐most prevalent heavy metal contaminant in hazardous waste sites 59 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12] Among all these methods, the chemical reduction of Cr(VI) to trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) in water is widely considered a highly effective approach, as it does not require complex systems, large amounts of organic additives, or additional energy sources (such as electricity, heat, or light) and provides mild and safe reaction conditions. 13,14 The toxicity of chromium is primarily determined by its oxidation state. Cr(VI) is highly soluble in water and extremely toxic, whereas trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) is nontoxic and an essential micronutrient for the metabolism of proteins, glucose, and lipids in humans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%