2017
DOI: 10.4103/jioh.jioh_163_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyether ether ketone in protocol bars: Mechanical behavior of three designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference is due to the smaller material volume on the upper region of the inverse T bar. Under oblique load, the bar showed significant difference between results (15%), considering material's tensile strength, corroborating Carvalho et al [31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This difference is due to the smaller material volume on the upper region of the inverse T bar. Under oblique load, the bar showed significant difference between results (15%), considering material's tensile strength, corroborating Carvalho et al [31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Polymers have been studied as a replacement for metal in protocol-type prostheses infrastructures because they are lighter and more aesthetic materials, among other factors (Anzolin et al, 2017;Aquino et al, 2018;Jaros et al, 2018). Polyether ether ketone (PEEK), previously used in Medicine in orthopedic prostheses and devices, has been employed in dentistry due to its good mechanical behavior (Carvalho et al, 2017;Aquino et al, 2018;Jaros et al, 2018) and elasticity module close to that of the jawbone (Bechir et al, 2016;Manolea et al, 2017). It has been noted that polymers reinforced with intertwined glass fibers show better fracture strength than those reinforced with unidirectional fibers (Vallittu,1998), thus justifying Zantex (Bono et al, 2016) as the polymer of choice for this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tridimensional models consisted of edentulous mandibular arches with 5 Titamax CM ExAcqua-standard implants 3.75x11mm (Neodent) and CM mini straight abutments with 1.5 mm cuffs. The bars are designed with rectangular cross section measuring 4.0mm of width x 6.0mm of height and distal cantilever of 9.0mm (Carvalho et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under axial load, peaks occurred on the bars adjacent to the contact surface between the left posterior implant's intermediate and the bar. Given the difference in rigidity of Ni-Cr and PEEK, smaller values are expected on the same load conditions, as shown by other authors,[ 34 35 36 ] particularly by de Carvalho et al .,[ 19 ] who showed that metal bars present higher compression strength compared to PEEK bars, regardless of its design. Under oblique load, M1 model presented peaks at the lingual region of the left posterior implant cavum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) is a biomaterial currently applied to dental and medical devices[ 17 18 ] that has been studied as an alternative to metal alloys in protocol type bars. [ 19 ] It is a linear high-performance polymer due to its mechanical properties, stability at high temperatures, and chemical resistance. PEEK also shows coloration similar to that of the teeth, low weight and is an alternative to patients with metal allergies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%