2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polycystic ovary syndrome and postpartum depression among Hispanics and non-Hispanics: a population-based study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, some studies did not include information on a control group, did not include measures of association, used a continuous outcome instead of dichotomous outcome, or did not provide information about risk/prevalence that was needed to compute the prevalence ratios. The general characteristics of the 25 included studies (12-36) are detailed in Supplemental Tables 2-5 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, some studies did not include information on a control group, did not include measures of association, used a continuous outcome instead of dichotomous outcome, or did not provide information about risk/prevalence that was needed to compute the prevalence ratios. The general characteristics of the 25 included studies (12-36) are detailed in Supplemental Tables 2-5 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six studies, all of high quality (Supplemental Table 6), were included examining the association between postpartum depression and PCOS (30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36). Compared to age-matched women without PCOS, those with PCOS had a higher prevalence of postpartum depression in the meta-analysis, however this association did not reach statistical significance (random effects PR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.96, 1.50; Fig.…”
Section: Excess Prevalence Of Postpartum Depression In Women With Pcosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some studies did not include information on a control group, did not include measures of association, used a continuous outcome instead of dichotomous outcome, or did not provide information about risk/prevalence that was needed to compute the PRs. The general characteristics of the 25 included studies ( Alur-Gupta et al, 2019 ; Tan et al, 2017 ; Karjula et al, 2017 ; Tay et al, 2020 ; Kaur et al, 2019 ; Asik et al, 2015 ; Cesta et al, 2016 ; Hussain et al, 2015 ; Månsson et al, 2008 ; Jedel et al, 2010 ; Li et al, 2017 ; Damone et al, 2019 ; Hollinrake et al, 2007 ; Pastore et al, 2011 ; Cinar et al, 2011 ; Adali et al, 2008 ; Lee et al, 2017 ; Pirotta et al, 2019 ; Koric et al, 2021 ; Joham et al, 2016 ; Muchanga et al, 2017 ; March et al, 2018 ; Tay et al, 2019 ; Alur-Gupta et al, 2021 ; Fugal et al, 2022 ) are detailed in Supplementary file 2a–d .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six studies, all of high quality ( Supplementary file 2e ), were included examining the association between postpartum depression and PCOS ( Koric et al, 2021 ; Joham et al, 2016 ; Muchanga et al, 2017 ; March et al, 2018 ; Tay et al, 2019 ; Alur-Gupta et al, 2021 ; Fugal et al, 2022 ). Compared to age-matched women without PCOS, those with PCOS had a higher prevalence of postpartum depression in the meta-analysis, however this association did not reach statistical significance (random effects PR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.96, 1.50; Figure 2D ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%