2017
DOI: 10.1681/asn.2016090938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polycystic Kidney Disease without an Apparent Family History

Abstract: The absence of a positive family history (PFH) in 10%-25% of patients poses a diagnostic challenge for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). In the Toronto Genetic Epidemiology Study of Polycystic Kidney Disease, 210 affected probands underwent renal function testing, abdominal imaging, and comprehensive and mutation screening. From this cohort, we reviewed all patients with and without an apparent family history, examined their parental medical records, and performed renal imaging in all avail… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
85
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(40 reference statements)
4
85
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike Reed et al 1 and Iliuta et al, 3 we were unable to examine the parents of our trial participants. In a recent study, after extensive investigation of the parents of 209 patients with PKD, there were 58 FH − patients: 32 (15.3%) had a de novo mutation, 22 (10.5%) still had indeterminate family history, and 4 (1.9%) had an FH + in retrospect.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike Reed et al 1 and Iliuta et al, 3 we were unable to examine the parents of our trial participants. In a recent study, after extensive investigation of the parents of 209 patients with PKD, there were 58 FH − patients: 32 (15.3%) had a de novo mutation, 22 (10.5%) still had indeterminate family history, and 4 (1.9%) had an FH + in retrospect.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Among patients with a clinical and imaging-based diagnosis of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), a negative family history for ADPKD (FH − ) has been reported in 10% 1 and 14.2% 2 (this proportion is 27.8% in a broader PKD population 3 ). Clinical reasons for an FH − are unavailable information about the biological parents and undiagnosed mild or variable ADPKD associated with de novo mutations.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was reported that PKD1 or PKD2 mutation is found in 95.3% of ADPKD patients with a positive family history versus 55.5% of PKD patients without an apparent family history [3]. We previously identified PKD1 or PKD2 mutation in 60.4% of PKD patients without an apparent family history [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Two genes causing ADPKD have been identified, and it has been reported that 85% of patients have a mutation of polycystic kidney disease 1 (PKD1) gene (ch 16p13.3, 46 exons), while 15% have a mutation of PKD2 gene (ch 4q21, 15 exons) [2]. When making a diagnosis of ADP-KD, a family history of PKD and the number of renal cysts on imaging are important factors, but it was reported that about 25% of PKD patients do not have an apparent family history [3]. Apart from ADPKD, there are many other diseases that cause the development of numerous cysts in the kidneys, including autosomal recessive PKD (ARP-KD), nephronophthisis (NPHP), oral-facial-digital syndrome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%