2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.07.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in PM2.5 in Guangzhou, southern China: Spatiotemporal patterns and emission sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
22
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, CC became the most important source of PAHs (58±4 %), and the VE contribution was even lower than the BB contribution (31±4 %). The result was consistent with our previous study which used tracer-to-PAH ratio approach to identify sources at the six sites in Guangzhou (Gao et al 2012 (Fung et al 2010). The pollutant levels were cut down by 50-75 % due to the shift of China standards (level I) to China standard (level III).…”
Section: Source Contributions To Total Pahssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Instead, CC became the most important source of PAHs (58±4 %), and the VE contribution was even lower than the BB contribution (31±4 %). The result was consistent with our previous study which used tracer-to-PAH ratio approach to identify sources at the six sites in Guangzhou (Gao et al 2012 (Fung et al 2010). The pollutant levels were cut down by 50-75 % due to the shift of China standards (level I) to China standard (level III).…”
Section: Source Contributions To Total Pahssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The statistical description of the data collected and a qualitative source identification using tracer/PAH ratio method were previously described in detail by Gao et al (2012). In summary, the total PAH concentrations ranged from 2.67 to 68.9 ngm −3 , with an average value of 17.1 ngm −3 , comparable to those reported in previous studies in winter Guangzhou (Li et al 2006;Yang et al 2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations