2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.01.15.907519
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polycomb regulation is coupled to cell cycle transition in pluripotent stem cells

Abstract: SummaryWhen self-renewing pluripotent cells receive a differentiation signal, ongoing cell duplication needs to be coordinated with entry into a differentiation program. Accordingly, transcriptional activation of lineage specifiers genes and cell differentiation is confined to the G1-phase of the cell cycle by unknown mechanisms. We found that Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) subunits are differentially recruited to lineage specifier gene promoters across cell cycle in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). J… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the relationship between PRC2mediated histone methylation and DNA methylation is not fully understood, DNA methylation may serve to "lock in" gene silencing with a mechanism with more robust mitotic inheritance 147 . PRC2 targets in stem cells include pluripotency/stemness genes [148][149][150] , and are enriched for bivalent H3K27me3/H3K4me3 marks 151,152 , suggesting that PRC2 results in "poising" rather than in complete silencing at those sites. In contrast, more differentiated cells reinforce gene silencing by increasing the length of H3K27me3 domains, or through complementary silencing mechanisms including DNA methylation [114][115][116] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the relationship between PRC2mediated histone methylation and DNA methylation is not fully understood, DNA methylation may serve to "lock in" gene silencing with a mechanism with more robust mitotic inheritance 147 . PRC2 targets in stem cells include pluripotency/stemness genes [148][149][150] , and are enriched for bivalent H3K27me3/H3K4me3 marks 151,152 , suggesting that PRC2 results in "poising" rather than in complete silencing at those sites. In contrast, more differentiated cells reinforce gene silencing by increasing the length of H3K27me3 domains, or through complementary silencing mechanisms including DNA methylation [114][115][116] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine whether H3K27me3 loss correlates with changes in the expression of the Ago2&1_KO DEGs, we clustered ChIP-seq levels at transcript regions using kmeans (k=4) clustering (Dataset EV2) (Ramírez et al, 2016). The first cluster (cluster_1) represents the genes most strongly enriched in H3K27me3 in WT and highly overlaps with known bivalent genes in mESCs (Asenjo et al, 2020)…”
Section: Combined Loss Of Ago2and1 In Mescs Causes Global Loss Of H3k27me3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the comparison of the H3K27me3 ChIP-seq cluster_1 with known bivalent genes, the list of highconfidence bivalent "HC-Bivalent" genes from (Asenjo et al, 2020) was retrieved.…”
Section: Cluster-analysis Of Transcript-centric Histone Modification Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the concept of G1 as a window for cell fate change has been around for decades ( Mummery et al., 1987 ; Pierce et al., 1984 ; Wells, 1982 ), only recently it was shown, for both human and mouse PSCs, that G1-sorted cells respond more rapidly to differentiation cues than S- or G2-sorted cells, which do not respond until the next G1 phase ( Calder et al., 2013 ; Coronado et al., 2013 ; Pauklin and Vallier, 2013 ; Sela et al., 2012 ). Studies have also reported “noisy” expression of developmental genes during G1 ( Asenjo et al., 2020 ; Singh et al., 2013 ), which could represent a temporal priming step that enables PSCs to tip the balance from self-renewal to lineage specification. This finding was independently validated using PRO-seq analysis in mouse PSCs, which revealed a weak but consistent activation of various lineage-related genes and enhancers during early and late G1 phase ( Pelham-Webb et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in human PSCs have implicated signaling molecules (Smads, Cyclins), which naturally fluctuate during cell cycle, concluding that varying levels of these factors allow for differentiation to endoderm in early G1 and neuroectoderm in late G1 ( Pauklin et al., 2016 ; Pauklin and Vallier, 2013 ). Others consider that transient relaxation of repressive mechanisms during M-to-G1, such as the recently described cell-cycle-dependent fluctuations of PRC2 subunits ( Asenjo et al., 2020 ), could be sufficient to allow for gene de-repression. In agreement, promoters of transiently G1-activated genes predominantly enriched for binding of PRC2 components ( Pelham-Webb et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%