2009
DOI: 10.1242/dev.036921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polycomb group-dependent imprinting of the actin regulatorAtFH5regulates morphogenesis inArabidopsis thaliana

Abstract: During embryogenesis, Polycomb group (PcG) complexes deposit silencing histone modifications and target homeotic genes, which regulate the patterning of other transcription factors. This transcriptional network further maintains cell fate. However, genomewide identification of histone modifications has suggested that PcG complexes might regulate genes other than those encoding transcription factors. In Arabidopsis, we show that PcG activity directly targets the actin regulator formin ARABIDOPSIS FORMIN HOMOLOG… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(49 reference statements)
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous analysis of imprinted genes that do not exhibit activation of the paternal allele in endosperm fertilized with met1 pollen (FH5 and MEA) revealed that the maternally expressed PRC2 complex silences the paternal allele (10,11). In accordance with this idea, we identified 20 genes that exhibited activation of the paternal allele caused by a maternally inherited fie mutation (Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Paternal Met1 and Maternal Dme And Fie Mutations Onsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous analysis of imprinted genes that do not exhibit activation of the paternal allele in endosperm fertilized with met1 pollen (FH5 and MEA) revealed that the maternally expressed PRC2 complex silences the paternal allele (10,11). In accordance with this idea, we identified 20 genes that exhibited activation of the paternal allele caused by a maternally inherited fie mutation (Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Paternal Met1 and Maternal Dme And Fie Mutations Onsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The MEA gene is selfimprinted, with maternal MEA protein activity required to silence the paternal allele after fertilization (10). Maternal PRC2 proteins also silence the paternal allele of the actin regulator, ARABIDOPSIS FORMIN HOMOLOG 5 (FH5) (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the delay of early embryogenesis could be due to an indirect effect of loss of LRE in the endosperm. Nevertheless, our study adds LRE to a growing list of MEGs whose loss negatively impacts seed development, including ZIX, FH5, and NUWA in Arabidopsis (Ingouff et al, 2005;Fitz Gerald et al, 2009;Ngo et al, 2012;He et al, 2017) and MEG1 in maize (Gutiérrez-Marcos et al, 2004;Costa et al, 2012). Additionally, mutations in MEGs like FWA and AGL36 do not result in endosperm phenotypes (Kinoshita et al, 2004;Shirzadi et al, 2011).…”
Section: Silencing Of the Paternal Allele Of Lre May Be Controlled Bymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Imprinting (de novo monoallelic expression after fertilization) but also cytoplasmic inheritance of maternal or paternal transcripts can explain these observations Vielle-Calzada et al, 2000;Bayer et al, 2009). Thus, an analysis of steady state levels of parental transcripts is only sufficient to demonstrate imprinting if the candidate gene is not expressed prior to fertilization in the gametes, as is the case for the Arabidopsis genes PHERES1 (PHE1) and FORMIN HOMOLOG5 (FH5) and, in the embryo, for the maize gene Maternally expressed in embryo1 (Mee1) (Kö hler et al, 2005;Fitz Gerald et al, 2009;Jahnke and Scholten, 2009;Wuest et al, 2010). Alternatively, parent-of-origin-specific expression that increases after fertilization provides evidence for genomic imprinting in addition to parental transcripts potentially inherited from the gametes, whose abundance cannot increase.…”
Section: Defining Imprinted Loci: Meeting the Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%