Religion (Vorkonstantinisches Christentum: Apostolische Väter Und Apologeten) 1992
DOI: 10.1515/9783110861532-008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polycarp of Smyrna and Ignatius of Antioch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the authenticity of the Ignatian letters has been disputed since at least the seventeenth century (Schoedel 1992; Barnes 2008: 119-22; Cobb 2017: 181-85; Hartog 2018), the debate has received renewed energy since the late 1990s and shows few signs of slowing. While Ignatian scholars have continued to study the various textual recensions in which Ignatius’s letters are found (e.g., Smith 2006; Stewart 2013: 111-34; Cobb 2017; Gilliam 2017; Brennecke 2018), the ongoing discussion about date and authorship interrupts the consensus that Ignatius’s letters are authentically Ignatian and date to the early second century.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the authenticity of the Ignatian letters has been disputed since at least the seventeenth century (Schoedel 1992; Barnes 2008: 119-22; Cobb 2017: 181-85; Hartog 2018), the debate has received renewed energy since the late 1990s and shows few signs of slowing. While Ignatian scholars have continued to study the various textual recensions in which Ignatius’s letters are found (e.g., Smith 2006; Stewart 2013: 111-34; Cobb 2017; Gilliam 2017; Brennecke 2018), the ongoing discussion about date and authorship interrupts the consensus that Ignatius’s letters are authentically Ignatian and date to the early second century.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 7. See especially Zahn 1873: 491-541; Lightfoot 1889–1891: II.1, 233-430. For more detailed accounts of the history of research, see Schoedel 1992: 286-92, 345-49; Munier 1992; Barnes 2008: 119-22; Prinzivalli and Simonetti 2010: 283-91. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%