2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyacrylamide Hydrogel as a Bulking Agent for the Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux: Long-Term Results and Safety

Abstract: The success rate of polyacrylamide hydrogel for endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux is comparable to published results of dextranomer hyaluronic acid. The long-term safety data and potential lower cost of polyacrylamide hydrogel provide further support for the use of this nonparticulate bulking agent to treat reflux.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, only few published series are available on PAHG. [32][33][34] The success rate with this bulking agent appears promising, but more trials are needed prior to extensive use.…”
Section: Bulking Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, only few published series are available on PAHG. [32][33][34] The success rate with this bulking agent appears promising, but more trials are needed prior to extensive use.…”
Section: Bulking Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a metaanalysis published in 2016, the overall resolution rate ranged between 71 and 83%, depending on the injection technique. Studies with long-term follow-up [3-22 years, mostly performed with NASHA/Dx (Deflux)] have similarly reported resolution rates ranging between 69 and 100% (28, [85][86][87][88]. In addition to results in "uncomplicated" VUR, numerous studies have provided evidence that endoscopic injection is also effective in specific patient populations that may be deemed more difficult to treat (historically not considered for endoscopic therapy).…”
Section: Endoscopic Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intra-operative costs were highest with endoscopic injection, but the total cost (intra-operative plus post-operative hospitalization costs) was highest with the Cohen procedure (e8201), and similar with endoscopic treatment and laparoscopic reimplantation (e3283 and e3211, respectively). Observations regarding lower product costs with polyacrylamide hydrogel and smallsize dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer vs. NASHA/Dx have been made in some publications (88,123,129). Simple comparisons of product costs do not provide a complete pharmacoeconomic picture: formal studies that include the total long-term costs of patient management (influenced by long-term safety and efficacy of the treatments concerned) are needed for true pharmacoeconomic comparisons.…”
Section: Endoscopic Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment of VUR by endoscopic injection of PAHG obtained approval in Canada in October 2017, which is currently the only country to have given this approval 33 . Three contemporary studies have evaluated the use of PAHG injections in endoscopic treatment in VUR 21,34,35 .…”
Section: Polyacrylamide Hydrogel As An Alternative Bulking Agent For Vurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last trial from the same institution was published by Ramsay et al in 2017 and evaluated the long-term results and safety of PAHG in endoscopic treatment of VUR 35 . A prospective single-surgeon study was designed to evaluate PAHG in endoscopic treatment of grade I to V VUR.…”
Section: Polyacrylamide Hydrogel As An Alternative Bulking Agent For Vurmentioning
confidence: 99%