2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2022.414122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poly-icosahedral Co–Fe–Pd nanoalloy: Isomerism effect on the structural and magnetic properties from DFT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, from figures 1 and 2, we can see that Fe and Pd atoms prefer to be located on the surface, and Co atoms prefer to be located at inner sites. Consistent with the literature, these results promote the segregation phenomenon determined by the properties of atoms, such as atomic radius, cohesive energy, and surface energy [16,[45][46][47]. Co atoms prefer to be located in the inner sites because their atomic radius is smaller than Fe and Pd, and their surface and cohesive energy are greater [48].…”
Section: Gupta Level Dft Levelsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, from figures 1 and 2, we can see that Fe and Pd atoms prefer to be located on the surface, and Co atoms prefer to be located at inner sites. Consistent with the literature, these results promote the segregation phenomenon determined by the properties of atoms, such as atomic radius, cohesive energy, and surface energy [16,[45][46][47]. Co atoms prefer to be located in the inner sites because their atomic radius is smaller than Fe and Pd, and their surface and cohesive energy are greater [48].…”
Section: Gupta Level Dft Levelsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Quenching minima were treated differently when their energies differed by at least 1×10 −5 eV. The Gupta potential parameters were taken from the previous report by Yıldırım et al and Varas et al [16,17]. Many researchers have frequently used the Gupta potential to determine the properties of nanoalloys [16,17,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations