2018
DOI: 10.1039/c7nr09461b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(Poly)cation-induced protection of conventional and wireframe DNA origami nanostructures

Abstract: DNA nanostructures hold immense potential to be used for biological and medical applications. However, they are extremely vulnerable towards salt depletion and nucleases, which are common under physiological conditions. In this contribution, we used chitosan and linear polyethyleneimine for coating and long-term stabilization of several three-dimensional DNA origami nanostructures. The impact of the degree of polymerization and the charge density of the polymer together with the N/P charge ratio (ratio of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
67
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The composition, while ideal for the development of cells, may actually pose a hostile environment for DNA nanoconstructs, causing degradation and dehybridization of the constituent DNA molecules thereby rendering them incapable of fulfilling their purpose. [56a,59–63,67] Standard commercial 10% FBS includes a host of proteins for cell development but also DNA digesting components that can cleave DNA strands. The threat posed by serum nuclease activity to ssDNA and dsDNA molecules (e.g., short and plasmid forms) is well‐known, so it is essential to see if DNA nanostructures follow the same trend against serum‐based nucleases in physiologically relevant amounts.…”
Section: Dna Nanostructural Stability In Biological Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composition, while ideal for the development of cells, may actually pose a hostile environment for DNA nanoconstructs, causing degradation and dehybridization of the constituent DNA molecules thereby rendering them incapable of fulfilling their purpose. [56a,59–63,67] Standard commercial 10% FBS includes a host of proteins for cell development but also DNA digesting components that can cleave DNA strands. The threat posed by serum nuclease activity to ssDNA and dsDNA molecules (e.g., short and plasmid forms) is well‐known, so it is essential to see if DNA nanostructures follow the same trend against serum‐based nucleases in physiologically relevant amounts.…”
Section: Dna Nanostructural Stability In Biological Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11] This is due to two main factors involved in degradation of DNA nanostructures upon exposure to biological conditions: i) denaturation caused by low divalent cation concentration (physiological salt concentration approximately 0.04-0.8 mm MgCl 2 ), and ii) digestion caused by the presence of nucleases. [8] Multiple strategies have been developed to chemically or physically prevent the DNA nanostructures from falling apart in cellular media (for example, 10 % FBS), [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and in general, encapsulation of DNA nanostructures with different coating moieties prolongs the survival time the longest published. [12,14,[17][18][19] For example, while most bare DNA origami falls apart easily under physiological conditions, PEG-oligolysines, [12] lipid molecules, [17] or cationic polymers [18,19] can be applied as a coating material to extend the half-life of DNA origami by an order of up to approximately 100.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding also helps explain why most 3D DNA origami structures with average binding-domain lengths of 7-10 basepairs degrade when the global divalent salt concentration is low (0-0.8 mm MgCl 2 ). [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] DNA brick nanostructures that remain stable even in 1 PBS were still susceptible to nucleases. After confirming that DNA brick nanostructures were stable against low salt denaturation without the requirement of any additional stabilization techniques, the same 52 nt brick nanostructures were tested against nuclease digestion (Supporting Information, Figure S5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA nanostructures were prepared based on protocols already described in the work of Ahmadi et al [23,24]. These nanorods were initially designed with Cadnano 2.2.0 using the p8064 single stranded scaffold.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To showcase these editors and evaluate the precision of our data model, we designed cross-shaped nanostructures comprising two individual multilayer DNA origami nanorods. The nanorods consists of around 16,000 nucleotides, have an approximate size of 350nm × 8nm × 4nm (Figure 4a) and were originally designed for other applications [23].…”
Section: Dna Nanostructure Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%