2010
DOI: 10.1039/c0jm00386g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poly(amino-methacrylate) as versatile agent for carbon nanotube dispersion: an experimental, theoretical and application study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a variety of chemical and physical methods have been used to obtain good dispersions of the CNTs within polymer matrices. The different strategies include chemical modification, covalent attachments of monomers, oligomers, and polymers, adsorption of charged surfactants and polyelectrolytes, wrapping with polymers, non‐wrapping adsorption of partially collapsed block copolymers, and complexation by π–π or cation–π interactions …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a variety of chemical and physical methods have been used to obtain good dispersions of the CNTs within polymer matrices. The different strategies include chemical modification, covalent attachments of monomers, oligomers, and polymers, adsorption of charged surfactants and polyelectrolytes, wrapping with polymers, non‐wrapping adsorption of partially collapsed block copolymers, and complexation by π–π or cation–π interactions …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] In the field of biotechnology, CNTs-based biomaterials have also proved quite versatile with applications as diverse as prosthesis, biomolecular recognition and drug delivery systems. 4 Nonetheless, strong intermolecular π-π interactions between the nanotube walls and their high aspect ratio lead to a bundle-like arrangement, which represents a major drawback for their processability and application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first degradation started at 168°C for PGMIC and at 218°C for PGMIC-MWCNTs. The change in degradation temperature between PGMIC and PGMICMWCNTs is same as that of poly(N-(2-(dimethylamino) ethyl)-methacrylate) and poly(N-(2-(dimethylamino) ethyl)-methacrylate)/CNTs [35], which showed that hydrophobic effect is the mainly interaction between polymer and CNT. A degradation platform from 411°C to 481°C appeared in PGMIC-MWCNTs, which is different from the degradation curve of PGMIC.…”
Section: Effect Of Phmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The ultrasound method is often used to disperse CNTs in aqueous surfactant solution [34], while the stirring method is usually used to disperse CNTs in some polymer solutions [35]. In our case, both dispersion methods were investigated in MWCNT dispersions with PGMIC.…”
Section: Effect Of Dispersion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%