2008
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m709495200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poly(ADP-ribose) Binds to the Splicing Factor ASF/SF2 and Regulates Its Phosphorylation by DNA Topoisomerase I

Abstract: Human DNA topoisomerase I plays a dual role in transcription, by controlling DNA supercoiling and by acting as a specific kinase for the SR-protein family of splicing factors. The two activities are mutually exclusive, but the identity of the molecular switch is unknown. Here we identify poly(ADP-ribose) as a physiological regulator of the two topoisomerase I functions. We found that, in the presence of both DNA and the alternative splicing factor/splicing factor 2 (ASF/SF2, a prototypical SRprotein), poly(ADP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mapping of G3BP pADPr-binding indicates that the C-terminal glycine-and arginine-rich (GAR) region is a non-covalent pADPr-binding domain. The identification of a similar pADPr-binding GAR in the mRNA-binding protein ASF/SF2 supports our identification of the GAR region of G3BP as the pADPr-binding region (Malanga et al, 2008). Several reports indicate that GAR coordinates mRNA maturation events and mediates the nucleocytoplasmic trafficking of numerous RNA-binding proteins (reviewed by Godin and Varani, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mapping of G3BP pADPr-binding indicates that the C-terminal glycine-and arginine-rich (GAR) region is a non-covalent pADPr-binding domain. The identification of a similar pADPr-binding GAR in the mRNA-binding protein ASF/SF2 supports our identification of the GAR region of G3BP as the pADPr-binding region (Malanga et al, 2008). Several reports indicate that GAR coordinates mRNA maturation events and mediates the nucleocytoplasmic trafficking of numerous RNA-binding proteins (reviewed by Godin and Varani, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In fact, pADPr is already known to interfere with domain essential to protein-protein interaction and has the ability to act as a scaffold molecule. For example, pADPr will most likely modulate activities of proteins within SGs, as seen with the ability of pADPr to shift activity of topoisomerase I towards ASF/SF2 (Yung et al, 2004;Malanga et al, 2008) or the postulated ability of pADPr to modulate the activity of hnRNPs, thereby affecting mRNA splicing (Ji and Tulin, 2009). Moreover, Leung et al demonstrate that pADPr modulates the assembly and maintenance of an mRNP-enriched structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, PARP1 co-localizes with CTCF on chromatin; this complex, with CTCF-dependent automodification of PARP1, permits PARylation activity in the absence of DNA damage (137,139). Importantly, many splicing factors are regulated by PARylation (140)(141)(142)(143)(144) and any iAs-mediated inhibition of PARP1 binding to DNA not only affects the structural properties of chromatin but also the PARylation activities, which indirectly affect splicing decisions. In addition, the binding of proteins to DNA can be altered by the presence of iAs due to the high binding affinity of this metalloid for cysteine residues that are found in C4 and C3H1 zinc finger motif-containing proteins such as PARP1 (145)(146)(147).…”
Section: Alternative Splicingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), accumulates at genes that are highly expressed during S-phase such as histone genes. The Top1 deficiency might affect fork progression in two ways; through Top1's role in releasing super-coiling between two types of converging forks, and through Top1's role in regulation of mRNP assembly, presumably by binding and phosphorylating splicing factors of the SR family (Rossi, et al 1996;Soret, et al 2003;Malanga, et al 2008). It has long been known that in bacterial genomes highly-expressed genes are oriented such that transcription does not interfere with replication and it has been proposed that this might also be true for a large fraction of the human genome (Huvet, et al 2007).…”
Section: Interference Between Rna Polymerase II Transcription and Thementioning
confidence: 99%