2013
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poly(ADP-ribose) binding to Chk1 at stalled replication forks is required for S-phase checkpoint activation

Abstract: Damaged replication forks activate poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1), which catalyses poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) formation; however, how PARP1 or poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is involved in the S-phase checkpoint is unknown. Here we show that PAR, supplied by PARP1, interacts with Chk1 via a novel PAR-binding regulatory (PbR) motif in Chk1, independent of ATR and its activity. iPOND studies reveal that Chk1 associates readily with the unperturbed replication fork and that PAR is required for efficient retention of C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
110
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
12
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2A; Fig. S2A), but PARP-1-depleted cells displayed higher levels of DNA synthesis than PARP-1-expressing cells, as previously reported (Min et al, 2013) (Fig. S2A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2A; Fig. S2A), but PARP-1-depleted cells displayed higher levels of DNA synthesis than PARP-1-expressing cells, as previously reported (Min et al, 2013) (Fig. S2A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Chk1 was found to be less abundant in the chromatin-bound fraction of PARP-1-deficient cells than in that of control cells. We thus confirmed that PARP-1 defects decrease the stability of Chk1 on DNA (Min et al, 2013) (Fig. S1A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It should be noted, however, that other experimental conditions recently reported to induce similar levels of reversed replication forks have not been associated with DDR activation (11,(32)(33)(34), excluding the possibility that fork reversal per se is sufficient to induce checkpoint activation and chromatin recruitment of DSB repair factors. Checkpoint activation upon PAR accumulation may directly reflect the recently reported physical association of PAR with checkpoint factors, such as CHK1 (35). Alternatively, the persistence of reversed forks upon impairment of PAR degradation may lead to recruitment of cellular factors usually recruited at DSB (53BP1 and RAD51), either before or after nucleolytic processing of the stalled reversed forks (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%