2022
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2022.3194551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

POLSAR Target Recognition Using a Feature Fusion Framework Based on Monogenic Signal and Complex-Valued Nonlocal Network

Abstract: With the continuous development of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) systems, multi-polarization information has been increasingly applied to numerous fields, and automatic target recognition (ATR) in polarimetric SAR (POLSAR) has been recognized as vital problem. The SAR recognition methods can primarily fall into handcrafted feature-based algorithms and deep learning algorithms. The former exhibits excellent interpretability but insufficient generalization; the latter achieves stronger representational ability … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the effectiveness of the MF-DCMANet, a range of advanced PolSAR target recognition methods are compared as benchmarks, such as algorithms based on handcrafted features or deep learning and algorithms based on multi-feature fusion. Among the algorithms based on handcrafted features, we focus on comparing the methods based on monogenic features and polarization features, such as polarimetric scattering coding [56], polarimetric decomposition [57], Monogenic Scale Space (Mono) [14,58], Mono-HOG [59], Mono-BoVW [10], Monogenic Signal on Grassmann Manifolds (Mono-Grass) [15], and other methods, such as Steerable Wavelet Frames [16], Attributed scattering center (ASC) model [60]. Among deep learning-based algorithms, we compare the CNN-based and transformer-based methods, as well as the other novel methods.…”
Section: Classification Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To assess the effectiveness of the MF-DCMANet, a range of advanced PolSAR target recognition methods are compared as benchmarks, such as algorithms based on handcrafted features or deep learning and algorithms based on multi-feature fusion. Among the algorithms based on handcrafted features, we focus on comparing the methods based on monogenic features and polarization features, such as polarimetric scattering coding [56], polarimetric decomposition [57], Monogenic Scale Space (Mono) [14,58], Mono-HOG [59], Mono-BoVW [10], Monogenic Signal on Grassmann Manifolds (Mono-Grass) [15], and other methods, such as Steerable Wavelet Frames [16], Attributed scattering center (ASC) model [60]. Among deep learning-based algorithms, we compare the CNN-based and transformer-based methods, as well as the other novel methods.…”
Section: Classification Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among deep learning-based algorithms, we compare the CNN-based and transformer-based methods, as well as the other novel methods. CNN-based methods include A-ConvNet [19], CV-CNN [20], CV-FCNN [61], CVNLNet [10], and RVNLNet with real input, the transformer-based method include ViT transformer [35], SpectralFormer [62], CrossViT [63], and other methods such as SymNet [64], monogenic ConvNet layer [65]. Furthermore, we also include multi-feature-based Mono-CVNLNet [10] and FEC [8] in our comparison of methods.…”
Section: Classification Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations