Pollutant concentrations and emission rates from natural gas cooking burners without and with range hood exhaust in nine California homes

Abstract

METHODS: Combustion pollutant concentrations were measured during the scripted operation of natural gas cooking burners in nine homes. In addition to a base condition of closed windows, no forced air unit (FAU) use, and no mechanical exhaust, additional experiments were conducted while operating an FAU and/or vented range hood. Test homes included a 26m 2 tworoom apartment, a 134m 2 first floor flat, and seven detached homes of 117-226m 2 . There were four single-story, four two-story and one 1.5 story homes. Cooktop use entailed boiling and simmering activities, using water as a heat sink. Oven and broiler use also were simulated. Timeresolved concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2), nitric oxide (NO), nitrogen oxides (NOX), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), particles with diameters of 6 nm or larger (PN), carbon monoxide (CO), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) were measured in the kitchen (K) and bedroom area (BR) of each home. CO2, NO, NO2, and PN data from sequential experiments were analyzed to quantify the contribution of burner use to the highest 1h and 4h time-integrated concentrations in each room.RESULTS: Four of the nine homes had kitchen 1h NO2 exceed the national ambient air quality standard (100 ppb). Two other homes had 1h NO2 exceed 50 ppb in the kitchen, and three had 1h NO2 above 50 ppb in the bedroom, suggesting substantial exposures to anyone at home when burners are used for a single substantial event. In all homes, the highest 1h kitchen PN exceeded 2 x10 5 cm -3 -h, and the highest 4h PN exceeded 3 x10 5 cm -3 -hr in all homes. The lowest 1h kitchen/bedroom ratios were 1.3-2.1 for NO in the apartment and two open floor plan homes. The largest K/BR ratios of 1h NO2 were in a two-story 1990s home retrofitted for deep energy savings: ratios in this home were 3.3 to 6.6. Kitchen 1h ratios of NO, NO2 and PN to CO2 were used to calculate fuel normalized emission factors (ng J -1 ). Range hood use substantially reduced cooking burner pollutant concentrations both in the kitchen and bedroom of several homes. A hood with large capture volume and a measured flow of 108 L/s reduced concentrations 80-95%.IMPLICATIONS: These measurements demonstrate that operation of natural gas cooking burners without venting can cause short-term kitchen concentrations of NO2 to exceed the US outdoor health standard, and can elevate concentrations of NO, NO2, and ultrafine particles throughout the home. Results are generally consistent with a recent simulation study that estimated widespread 1h NO2 exposures exceeding 100 ppb in homes that use gas burners without venting. While operating a venting range hood can greatly reduce pollutant levels from burner use (and presumably from cooking as well), performance varies widely across hoods. Increased awareness of the need to ventilate when cooking would substantially reduce in-home exposure to NO2 and ultrafine particles in California homes. Helping consumers select effective hoods, for example by publishing capture efficiency performance ratings, also would help reduce ex...

Quantification of the impact of cooking processes on indoor concentrations of volatile organic species and primary and secondary organic aerosols

“…For example, Singer et al. (2004) and (2017) reported K e values between 1 and 3 m and between 2 and 7 m for monoterpenes and for n‐alkanes with a carbon number similar to C3 compounds, respectively. The adsorption rates (times the S / V ratio) of gaseous cooking emissions range between 0.4 and 1.2 h −1 , comparable to those reported for other compounds (eg, ozone; Table ) or determined for organic gases from measurements in simulated indoor residential environments (eg, Singer et al.…”

Illuminating the dark side of indoor oxidants

“…For example, oxidants* have been detected in simulated and real indoor environments aer cleaning or disinfection of surfaces 7,18,19 and water, 20 as well as aer the use of air fresheners. 21 Cooking is an important source of indoor oxidants*, 12,[22][23][24] as is burning of candles or incense, 12,25 cigarette smoking, 12,26 and vaping. 27 Several types of air puriers can increase indoor O 3 levels, either deliberately (e.g., O 3 generators) or as a byproduct of their operation (e.g., ion generators, electrostatic precipitators, and some UV-lamp containing air cleaners).…”

Modeling transient particle transport by fast fluid dynamics with the Markov chain method

“…Although people stay indoors for most of their time (Klepeis et al 2001), particles that originate outdoors can enter indoor environments through natural ventilation, mechanical ventilation, and infiltration (Chen and Zhao 2011;Chen et al 2011ab, 2012aLee et al 2017;Shi et al 2017). In addition to particles from the outdoor environment, there are many indoor particle sources, such as cigarette smoking (Patino and Siegel 2018), cooking (Singer et al 2017;Zhao and Zhao 2018), human activity (You et al 2013;Lai et al 2017), and chemical reactions (Chen et al 2012c;Yao and Zhao 2017). Furthermore, particles exhaled by an infected person can result in the transmission of many airborne infectious diseases indoors, including influenza (Moser et al 1979), tuberculosis (Menzies et al 2000), measles (Bloch et al 1985), and SARS (Yu et al 2004;Chen et al 2011c).…”