2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollinator-mediated evolution of floral signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
433
0
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 470 publications
(452 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
10
433
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefit of larger floral displays is associated with the cognition ability of bees (Schiestl & Johnson 2013), for which visual cues might enhance their efficiency (Kunze & Gumbert 2001). The lack of a relationship between tree visitation rate and density of flowering conspecifics could be related to the absence of competition or facilitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefit of larger floral displays is associated with the cognition ability of bees (Schiestl & Johnson 2013), for which visual cues might enhance their efficiency (Kunze & Gumbert 2001). The lack of a relationship between tree visitation rate and density of flowering conspecifics could be related to the absence of competition or facilitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That said, the strength of the interaction is unlikely to have been solely determined by flower abundance, given that factors including nectar and pollen reward (Hoover et al, 2012;Schiestl and Johnson, 2013), flower colour (Campbell et al, 2010), and odours (Cunningham et al, 2006;Junker et al, 2010) have also been shown to predict the number of interactions.…”
Section: Size Of Potential Effects Between Mango and Plant Species Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flower abundance is often an important predictor of indirect interactions, as a greater number of flowers equates to a greater chance of being encountered, patches containing many flowers can be more easily detected (Schiestl and Johnson, 2013), and pollinators tend to visit more inflorescences in larger patches of flowers (Goulson, 2000). That the strength of indirect effects increased with flower abundance at a greater rate for weeds and exotic plant species flowering in mango fields than for species growing in natural vegetation highlights the value of weeds in supporting flower visitors, an observation that has been noted elsewhere (Carvalheiro et al, 2011;Nel et al, 2017).…”
Section: Factors Affecting Potential Indirect Effects Between Mango Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This wide floral variation is considered to be the result of their interactions with pollinators (Darwin, 1862; Fægri & van der Pijl, 1979). Flowers signal to pollinators by a variety of cues and the extent of fertilization success associated with the variance of a trait creates selection on this trait (Aigner, 2006; Harder & Johnson, 2009; Schiestl & Johnson, 2013; Sletvold, Grindeland, & Ågren, 2010). Much attention was given in the last decades to the quantification of the extent of selection exerted by pollinators on various floral traits, including flower size, color, and scent (Harder & Johnson, 2009; Schiestl & Johnson, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flowers signal to pollinators by a variety of cues and the extent of fertilization success associated with the variance of a trait creates selection on this trait (Aigner, 2006; Harder & Johnson, 2009; Schiestl & Johnson, 2013; Sletvold, Grindeland, & Ågren, 2010). Much attention was given in the last decades to the quantification of the extent of selection exerted by pollinators on various floral traits, including flower size, color, and scent (Harder & Johnson, 2009; Schiestl & Johnson, 2013). However, the mechanisms maintaining within‐population variation are much less understood and are not necessarily pollinator‐mediated (Gigord, Macnair, & Smithson, 2001; Imbert et al., 2014; de Jager & Ellis, 2014; Lau & Galloway, 2004; Melendez‐Ackerman, Campbell, & Waser, 1997; Rymer, Johnson, & Savolainen, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%