1996
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.1996.424.56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollination in Rosa Rugosa Thunb. Ex Murray

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Certain chromosomal areas may have a lower frequency of recombination or some gamete selection factors such as male sterility may restrain recombination. The existence of interparental incompatibility alleles and chromosomal rearrangements would explain the observed distorted segregations (Ueda et al 1996). Thus, the differentiation between parental chromosomes is most likely the cause of distortion (Kianian andQuirros 1992, Faure et al 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Certain chromosomal areas may have a lower frequency of recombination or some gamete selection factors such as male sterility may restrain recombination. The existence of interparental incompatibility alleles and chromosomal rearrangements would explain the observed distorted segregations (Ueda et al 1996). Thus, the differentiation between parental chromosomes is most likely the cause of distortion (Kianian andQuirros 1992, Faure et al 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, sources of unintentional seedling selection caused by putative low vigour cannot be excluded. A gametophytic incompatibility system has been described in R. rugosa (Ueda et al 1996). The existence of interparental incompatibility alleles could explain the distorted segregations that were observed.…”
Section: Segregation Distortionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strict self‐incompatibility in R . rugosa (Ueda et al, 1996), which appears relaxed in R. blanda (MacPhail, 2007), could increase hybridization rates in R . rugosa relative to R .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%