2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollen-wood analysis at the Neapolis harbour site (1st–3rd century AD, southern Italy) and its archaeobotanical implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even the pollen data obtained in the ancient Roman harbor of Naples (Allevato et al 2009(Allevato et al , 2010 and from analyses of pollen preserved in tiles of ancient Pompeii (Mariotti Lippi & Bellini 2006) only indicate very low amounts of chestnut from the 1st century BC up to the 5th century AD (Figure 4). Indeed, in southern Italy, this corroborates the conclusions by Conedera et al (2004), according to which the chestnut expansion was later than the 5th-6th century AD.…”
Section: ; Sadori and Giardini 2008)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even the pollen data obtained in the ancient Roman harbor of Naples (Allevato et al 2009(Allevato et al , 2010 and from analyses of pollen preserved in tiles of ancient Pompeii (Mariotti Lippi & Bellini 2006) only indicate very low amounts of chestnut from the 1st century BC up to the 5th century AD (Figure 4). Indeed, in southern Italy, this corroborates the conclusions by Conedera et al (2004), according to which the chestnut expansion was later than the 5th-6th century AD.…”
Section: ; Sadori and Giardini 2008)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This goal is very challenging, at times quite impossible to fully achieve, especially when the plants in the natural vegetation are the same plants used in the site, as often is the case in prehistory. But in the last years, the number of investigations tackling this issue by contemporarily considering both macro-and microremains in archaeological contexts are increasing (Jeraj, 2002;Mariotti Lippi et al, 2003, 2008cMercuri et al, , 2007Delhon et al, 2008;Jeraj et al, 2009;Allevato et al, 2010;Breitenlechner et al, 2010;Sadori et al, 2010a,b;Sasaki and Takahara, 2011;Bosi et al, 2011). This "new" archaeobotanical research strategy allows producing multiple types of records, and by crossing these different sources more light is shed on the palaeoethnobotanical significance of some plant remains as well as on palaeovegetational reconstruction.…”
Section: Archaeobotany In Arid Lands Some Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of significant variations in Pb abundances throughout the core, with the exception of the top 50 cm, shows that uncontaminated preharbor layers have not been found. The lack of a preharbor unit has been attributed to the dredging of the bottom sediments during the late fourth century/ middle third century BC (9,11,12,18), which is attested to by scars in the underlying Yellow Tuff bedrock.…”
Section: Ce (mentioning
confidence: 99%