1991
DOI: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1991.tb12603.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollen Morphology and Ultrastructure of the Cabombaceae: Correlations With Pollination Biology

Abstract: Of all species comprising the two genera of the Cabombaceae, only Brasenia schreberi J. F. Gmel. and Cabomba caroliniana Gray have been critically investigated with regard to their pollination biology. Brasenia schreberi has been shown to be anemophilous, while C. caroliniana has an entomophilous (myophilous) pollination syndrome. In the present paper, a number of pollen and pollen‐related characters, including pollen size, shape, quantity, terminal settling velocity, pollen‐ovule ratios, and overall exine arc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with other Caryophylloideae, both species have extremely large stigma areas and, due to the relatively long calyx length of these species, the pollen load is deposited mainly on the head and the proboscis of the pollinators (A. Jürgens, unpublished observation). According to Cruden (2000), stigma area relative to the pollen-bearing area directly influences the likelihood of a pollen grain reaching the stigma, and species with large stigma areas relative to pollen-bearing areas often show quite low P/Os (Mehrhoff 1983;Osborn et al 1991;Cruden 2000). There is, however, an alternative explanation for the low P/Os in S. dioica and S. latifolia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Compared with other Caryophylloideae, both species have extremely large stigma areas and, due to the relatively long calyx length of these species, the pollen load is deposited mainly on the head and the proboscis of the pollinators (A. Jürgens, unpublished observation). According to Cruden (2000), stigma area relative to the pollen-bearing area directly influences the likelihood of a pollen grain reaching the stigma, and species with large stigma areas relative to pollen-bearing areas often show quite low P/Os (Mehrhoff 1983;Osborn et al 1991;Cruden 2000). There is, however, an alternative explanation for the low P/Os in S. dioica and S. latifolia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Consequently, pollen characters have shown to be informative in studies of plant evolution and for resolving phylogenies (e.g. Doyle & Le Thomas 1994;Doyle & Endress 2000;Sauquet & Le Thomas 2003), for calibrating molecular dating analyses (Thornhill et al 2012), as well as for studying plant reproductive biology (Ferguson & Skvarla 1982;Grayum 1986;Osborn et al 1991;Bolinder et al 2015). In addition, fossil pollen data are also frequently used for reconstructing past vegetation types and for inferring paleoclimates (Hoorn et al 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is further clear that there has been a trend towards reduction of the number of plicae during the course of evolution in Ephedra ( Figure 14A). The morphology and structure of the exine are known to have substantial implications for the pollination biology of plants (Ferguson & Skvarla 1982;Grayum 1986;Osborn et al 1991;Bolinder et al 2015). For entomophilous pollen to be successfully transported from the microsporangiate structures to the ovulate structures (specifically in this case, to the pollination drop), the pollen needs to adhere to an insect vector.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, pollen grains of insect-pollinated taxa generally have low dispersability because of their higher U t . The U t of insect-pollinated taxa is rarely measured but, for example, pollen of the insectpollinated species Cabomba caroliniana A.Gray has a U t of 19.5 cm·s −1 ( Osborn et al, 1991 ). Although the difference in U t between the various species of Ephedra are less dramatic compared with that between P. sylvestris and C. caroliniana , we nevertheless judge these differences apparent and signifi cant, as well as congruent with previous studies of the pollination biology of this genus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%