2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10453-014-9335-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollen monitoring: minimum requirements and reproducibility of analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
257
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 391 publications
(261 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
257
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Daily observations were used. Following the EAN recommendations (Galán et al, 2014;Jäger et al, 1995), most samplers were located at heights of between 10 and 30 m on the roofs of suitable buildings. The places were frequently in the cities' downtown areas; i.e.…”
Section: Pollen Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Daily observations were used. Following the EAN recommendations (Galán et al, 2014;Jäger et al, 1995), most samplers were located at heights of between 10 and 30 m on the roofs of suitable buildings. The places were frequently in the cities' downtown areas; i.e.…”
Section: Pollen Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…they largely represent the urbanbackground conditions (although not always). With regard to microscopic analysis, the EAN recommendation is to count at least 10 % of the sample using horizontal or vertical strips (Galán et al, 2014). The actual procedures vary between the countries but generally comply.…”
Section: Pollen Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The number of IJB documents per country with just spore and mold or mould or fungal in their title, abstract or keywords from 1957 to 2017 a globally and b detailed for Europe (based on a Scopus® (Elsevier B.V.) search as of 28 March 2017) widely considered the standard method for aerobiological monitoring, as it is robust enough for outdoor operation and enables continuous uninterrupted sampling. However, retrieval of data requires considerable amounts of time, effort and the expertise for examining samples by light microscopy (Galán et al 2014) plus difficulties with calibration (Oteros et al 2017). As a result, a degree of error is introduced into the data (systematic instrumental and random errors from operators) and a delay between sampling time and eventual data acquisition is inevitable, meaning that the "real-time" use of data cannot be achieved.…”
Section: Knowledge Gaps and Research Needs/prioritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The International Association for Aerobiology (IAA) recommends for the samples reading at magnification 400× minimum of 3 longitudinal bands or at least 12 transverse bands or minimum 500 random fields (Jäger et al, 1995). The actual sampling methods (longitudinal, transverse or random) and magnifications may vary between the several national networks but are generally compliant (Jato et al, 2006;Skjøth et al, 2010;García-Mozo et al, 2009;Sofiev et al, 2015;Galán et al, 2014;Thibaudon et al, 2014). We based our study on daily pollen concentrations, although for some stations hourly data are available.…”
Section: Observed Pollen Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%