2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01803.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollen competition as an asymmetric reproductive barrier between two closely relatedSilenespecies

Abstract: Reproductive barriers are important determinants of gene flow between divergent populations or species. We studied pollen competition as a post‐mating reproductive barrier between Silene dioica and S. latifolia. Gene flow between these species is extensive, but early‐generation hybrids are rare. In an experiment with conspecific, heterospecific and 50 : 50 mixed pollinations in the two species, pollination treatments did not significantly affect seed set and seed weight. However, molecular determination of sir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
66
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Until recently, the great majority of research in reproductive barriers has examined the nature and evolution of either premating barriers or late-acting postzygotic barriers such as hybrid sterility and inviability (Markow 1997;Howard 1999;Coyne and Orr 2004). However, cryptic barriers that are realized within the reproductive systems of hybridizing females have received increasing attention (e.g., Rieseberg et al 1995;Howard et al 1998;Price et al 2000;Chang 2004;Fricke and Arnqvist 2004a;Rahmé et al 2009). As a result, it is now clear that cryptic post-mating barriers can take a variety of forms (Eberhard 2009), including the failure of heterospecific sperm (or pollen) to survive or remain motile (Price et al 2000), the incompatibility of heterospecific sperm and eggs (Palumbi and Metz 1991), the tendency for conspecific sperm to outcompete heterospecific sperm in fertilizing the eggs of multiply-mated females (Howard 1999), the reduced fecundity of females that mate with heterospecific males (Nosil and Crespi 2006), and the early abortion of F1 embryos (Matsubayashi and Katakura 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, the great majority of research in reproductive barriers has examined the nature and evolution of either premating barriers or late-acting postzygotic barriers such as hybrid sterility and inviability (Markow 1997;Howard 1999;Coyne and Orr 2004). However, cryptic barriers that are realized within the reproductive systems of hybridizing females have received increasing attention (e.g., Rieseberg et al 1995;Howard et al 1998;Price et al 2000;Chang 2004;Fricke and Arnqvist 2004a;Rahmé et al 2009). As a result, it is now clear that cryptic post-mating barriers can take a variety of forms (Eberhard 2009), including the failure of heterospecific sperm (or pollen) to survive or remain motile (Price et al 2000), the incompatibility of heterospecific sperm and eggs (Palumbi and Metz 1991), the tendency for conspecific sperm to outcompete heterospecific sperm in fertilizing the eggs of multiply-mated females (Howard 1999), the reduced fecundity of females that mate with heterospecific males (Nosil and Crespi 2006), and the early abortion of F1 embryos (Matsubayashi and Katakura 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible causes of asymmetric gene flow in plants include the relative abundance of each parent species at the hybrid site (e.g., as reported in Magnolia by Muranishi et al 2013), differences in flower morphology (e.g., as described in Eucalyptus by Field et al 2011), pollinator behavior (e.g., as reported in Yucca by Starr et al 2013), and postmating reproductive barriers resulting in differential pollen success (e.g., as described in Silene by Rahme et al 2009). In a series of controlled, reciprocal hybridizations between YT and DT, carried out by Ward et al (2009), a greater proportion of hand-pollinated crosses with YT as the female parent produced viable seed (49.1%) compared with those with DT as the female parent (10.1%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El aumento en la cantidad de polen debió favorecer una mayor competencia polínica. Antecedentes sobre el efecto de la competencia polínica para el adecuado desarrollo de frutos fueron presentados, para diversas especies, por Schlichting et al (1987), Winsor et al (2000) y Rahme et al (2009), entre otros.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified