DOI: 10.18130/v3859x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Politics, Poverty, and Policy in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this article we examine the impact of class and racial discrimination on Afro-descendant women social welfare beneficiaries in Brazil and the USA. In Brazil, despite the fact that 73% of households receiving the conditional cash transfer program (Arruda, 2014), Bolsa Família are Afro-Brazilian (black and brown), there are few research studies that consider the racial identification or skin color of beneficiaries (Mariano and Carloto, 2013; Kaknes, 2016; Micheli, 2018; Mitchell-Walthour, 2019). In the United States, 20.8 % of those receiving Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) benefits are Black/African American (WIC Racial-Ethnic Group Enrollment 2016) and Blacks made up 25.6% of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) beneficiaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article we examine the impact of class and racial discrimination on Afro-descendant women social welfare beneficiaries in Brazil and the USA. In Brazil, despite the fact that 73% of households receiving the conditional cash transfer program (Arruda, 2014), Bolsa Família are Afro-Brazilian (black and brown), there are few research studies that consider the racial identification or skin color of beneficiaries (Mariano and Carloto, 2013; Kaknes, 2016; Micheli, 2018; Mitchell-Walthour, 2019). In the United States, 20.8 % of those receiving Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) benefits are Black/African American (WIC Racial-Ethnic Group Enrollment 2016) and Blacks made up 25.6% of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) beneficiaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most widely studied area of these policy-based externalities is the arena of electoral politics. Many scholars show that CCT programs have political effects, particularly in elections, and that these effects can obtain either for society at large (Corrêa & Cheibub, 2016, Layton & Smith, 2015), or can have particular effects on the voting behavior of beneficiaries (on the Bolsa Família specifically, see Hunter and Power 2007, Kaknes 2016, Licio et al 2009, Zucco 2008, 2013, 2015). Some studies show that beneficiaries with different traits experience differential effects of policy receipt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Micheli (2018) shows that the Bolsa Família program differentially affects the electoral behavior of Black and White beneficiaries vis-à-vis casting null ballots and support for incumbent politicians. Kaknes (2016) shows that beneficiaries who are aware of the incumbent Workers' Party's (PT's) role in promulgating the program are much more likely to support PT candidates, even for state-wide elections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%