2020
DOI: 10.1017/s0007680520000653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Politics, International Banking, and the Debt Crisis of 1982

Abstract: How does politics affect private international lending? This article highlights the relationship between international banks, their home governments, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and international regulators during the years that preceded the debt crisis of 1982. Based on new archival evidence from different case studies, we find that the decisions of commercial banks to lend were largely based on the home governments’ preferences, competition, and the assumption that home governments and internation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…intervention of authorities forced Mosquera to act on his own. Furthermore, the headquarters of foreign banks overlent to Latin American governments during the 1970s, partially because they expected their home governments or the IMF to bailout their borrowers in the event of a macroeconomic crisis (Devlin, 1989;Altamura & Zendejas, 2020).…”
Section: Explaining Heterogeneous Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…intervention of authorities forced Mosquera to act on his own. Furthermore, the headquarters of foreign banks overlent to Latin American governments during the 1970s, partially because they expected their home governments or the IMF to bailout their borrowers in the event of a macroeconomic crisis (Devlin, 1989;Altamura & Zendejas, 2020).…”
Section: Explaining Heterogeneous Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the headquarters of foreign banks lent recklessly to Latin American governments during the 1970s (Devlin, 1989;Marichal, 2013, pp. 179-224;Altamura & Zendejas, 2020). The literature on rogue trading at multinational banks provides another case in point (Schenk, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first two parties can communicate with one another only through “furtive signs” (Goffman 1971: 339). Regulators have been found to engage in communication that is “cryptic” to the public (Altamura and Zendejas 2020:768) but can be decoded by market participants. Yet there are limits to how differently one message can be understood.…”
Section: Crises In the Frontstage/backstage Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They recognized that it would not be practical to lay down in advance detailed rules and procedures for the provision of temporary liquidity. But they were satisfied that means are available for that purpose and will be used if and when necessary" (see Altamura and Flores Zendejas, 2020).…”
Section: The Imf As Ilolr-in-chiefmentioning
confidence: 99%