2008
DOI: 10.1177/0267323108089222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Politicians in the News: Media or Party Logic?

Abstract: This study departs from the finding that media attention contributed to the electoral success of candidates in the Belgian election campaign of 2003. While the authors do find an impact of media attention on the number of preferential votes for each candidate, in this study they take a closer look at the elements that determine this media attention. Do the media autonomously decide which candidate gets more attention than others or do they follow the hierarchy determined by the parties? In other words: is the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that mainly the response of the cabinet minister is newsworthy is in line with extant research that argues that journalists favour sources with more institutional power (Bennett 1990; van Dalen 2011). That, in particular, MPs of government parties are seldom mentioned in the news following a question might be a consequence of the fact that the cabinet ministers (being the more prominent politicians of sometimes the same party) have already received a lot of attention (see also Van Aelst et al 2008).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finding that mainly the response of the cabinet minister is newsworthy is in line with extant research that argues that journalists favour sources with more institutional power (Bennett 1990; van Dalen 2011). That, in particular, MPs of government parties are seldom mentioned in the news following a question might be a consequence of the fact that the cabinet ministers (being the more prominent politicians of sometimes the same party) have already received a lot of attention (see also Van Aelst et al 2008).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We follow previous research in identifying five news factors that are particularly important for coverage of political actors (see Helfer & Van Aelst, 2016;Hopmann et al, 2012;Tresch, 2009): political power, negativity, surprise, relevance, and continuity. First, we expect messages by powerful politicians to have higher chances to make the news than those sent by actors without a powerful position (Balmas, Rahat, Sheafer, & Shenhav, 2014;Entman, 2007;Galtung & Ruge, 1965;Gans, 1979;Helfer & Van Aelst, 2016;Tresch, 2009;Van Aelst, Maddens, Noppe, & Fiers, 2008;Vliegenthart, Boomgaarden, & Boumans, 2011). Second, the media is particularly attentive to stories that include negativity and conflict (e.g., Ansolabehere & Iyengar, 1995), so campaign messages that satisfy the media's demand for conflict and aggression should carry a higher news value (Gans, 1979).…”
Section: Partisan Bias In Message Selection 369mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides a direct electoral connection, presence in the media arena can also have indirect electoral effects. Parties may put candidates that successfully enter and perform in the media arena higher on the ballot list (Davis, 2010;Van Aelst, Maddens, Noppe, & Fiers, 2008b) or mediatized candidates may attract more funding from sponsors (e.g., Heldman, Carroll, & Olson, 2005). The importance of entering and performing in the media arena goes well beyond elections.…”
Section: The Arena Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%