2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Politically motivated brand rejection

Abstract: This paper introduces the concept of politically motivated brand rejection (PMBR) as an emergent form of anti-consumption behavior. PMBR is the refusal to purchase and/or use a brand on a permanent basis because of its perceived association to a particular political ideology that the consumer opposes. Specifically, the paper discusses three distinct sets of political ideologies that can lead to rejection of certain brands by some consumers. These ideologies include predatory globalization, chauvinistic nationa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
161
1
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(7 reference statements)
6
161
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As Aydın's account reveals some brands can be regarded as ''enemies of Islam'' and elder brothers instruct new members to stay away from them. Similar to previous research (IzberkBilgin, 2012;Sandıkcı and Ekici, 2009), we find that brands that are perceived to be associated with Israel are sanctioned in the community: Some time ago, there was this list of Jewish products. They [elder brother] told we'd rather not use these products.…”
Section: Learning Communally Appropriate Forms Of Consumptionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As Aydın's account reveals some brands can be regarded as ''enemies of Islam'' and elder brothers instruct new members to stay away from them. Similar to previous research (IzberkBilgin, 2012;Sandıkcı and Ekici, 2009), we find that brands that are perceived to be associated with Israel are sanctioned in the community: Some time ago, there was this list of Jewish products. They [elder brother] told we'd rather not use these products.…”
Section: Learning Communally Appropriate Forms Of Consumptionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Swimberghe, Flurry and Parker (2011) also examine the religious commitment of consumers, or religiosity as termed by Sandıkcı and Ekici (2009) and suggest that "customers who are highly religious not only morally judge sellers" support of controversial causes as wrong, but also express their dissatisfaction in the marketplace through an increase in boycott participation" (p. 464). In line with previous research, this study tests the following:…”
Section: Religious Animosity Boycotting Behaviour and Product Judgmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They do so also because they identify with the store and consider it an extension of their ''selves.'' When faced with organizations acting in conflict with their values, consumers may choose to ''disidentify'' with the organization, believing that the organization has separated from its original attributes and violated the consumer's values or beliefs (Sandikci and Ekici, 2009). Such disidentification leads to consumer's rejection of the organization, product, or brand, as a means to communicate his or her dissatisfaction.…”
Section: Voice Complaining and Third-party Complainingmentioning
confidence: 99%