Political uncertainty and household savings

Abstract

Despite macroeconomic evidence pointing to a negative aggregate consumption response due to political uncertainty, few papers have used microeconomic panel data to analyze how households adjust their consumption after an uncertainty shock. We study household savings and expenditure adjustment from an unexpected, large-scale and rapidly evolving political shock that occurred largely in May 1989 in Beijing, China. Using monthly micro panel data, we present evidence that a surge in political uncertainty resulted in significant temporary increases in savings among urban households in China. Households responded mainly by reducing semi-durable expenditure and frequency of major durable adjustment. The uncertainty effect is more pronounced among older, wealthier, and more socially advantaged households. We interpret our findings using existing models of precautionary behavior. By focusing on time variation in uncertainty, our identification strategy avoids many of the potential problems in empirical studies of precautionary savings such as self-selection and life-cycle effects.

Household behaviour in times of political change: Evidence from Egypt

“…Thirdly, this paper is also related to the literature investigating whether violence changes the perception of risk and economic decisions. Aaberge et al (2014) find that, in line with a precautionary savings model, households save more following a political shock in the context of China. Callen et al (2014) investigate the relationship between violence and economic risk preferences in Afghanistan and identify a preference for certainty with more exposure to violence.…”

Political Uncertainty and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from National Elections around the World

“…Political uncertainty plays a role in cost stickiness by generating demand uncertainty, a major determinant of cost behavior according to extensive prior research (e.g., Kallapur and Eldenburg 2005;Banker, Byzalov, and Plehn-Dujowich 2014). Political uncertainty can exert a dampening effect on various corporate activities (Baker et al 2016;Jens 2017), including by suppressing demand in capital (Colak et al 2017) and product markets (Aaberge et al 2017).…”

Household savings constraints, uncertainty and macroprudential policy

“…More recently, the potential causes of uncertainty have been broadened out to include policy or political considerations; Giavazzi and McMahon (2012) examine the implications for German household savings due to potential labour market reforms, while Aaberge et al. (2017) find that an increase in political uncertainty resulted in significant temporary increases in savings among urban Chinese households in 1989. As Fan and Yavas (2017) highlights, uncertainty differs between mortgage holders and those still hoping to receive a mortgage, given that the latter cohort face “uncertain purchase prices and uncertain downpayments at an uncertain purchase date.” Precautionary savings behaviour is therefore likely to also contribute to differences in perceived savings inadequacies between different tenure groups following the introduction of MPP.…”