Political science publications about Turkey

“Teachers' Emotional Labor” Publications in Web of Science: A Bibliometric Analysis

“…Despite a comprehensive picture of TEL publications that this article has managed to depict, two main limitations remain. First, the results of bibliometric analyses may be different when data sources other than the WoS are used (Mongeon and Paul-Hus, 2015 ; see Cansun and Arik, 2018 ). Second, due to the language constraint, an analysis combining national citation indexes (e.g., CNKI and Baidu Scholar based in China) may allow a more nuanced and contextualized understanding of TEL research.…”

“…Thomson Reuters' WoS was chosen as the database for analysis for three major reasons. First, WoS has been commonly chosen as the data source for bibliometric analyses studies in recent years (e.g., Cansun and Arik, 2018 ; Guo et al, 2020 ; Karakus et al, 2021 ). Second, WoS is one of the most established databases, which were built in 1900 with SSCI launched in the same year and A&HCI in 1975.…”

“…Therefore, SSCI and A&HCI were selected for full coverage of files relating to the term “emotional labor” coined by Hochschild ( 1983 : ix). Third, WoS provides a large database across 256 disciplines for people to search and analyze and generates more accurate information about the publications compared with other databases (Mongeon and Paul-Hus, 2015 ; Cansun and Arik, 2018 ).…”

Representations of countries in the international media: The case of Turkey in the BBC

“…This can also be observed in scientific studies of Turkish politics. For example, a bibliometric analysis of political science publications about Turkey covered in the Web of Science showed that the scientific articles from the 2000-2010 period were mostly about Turkey-EU relations, while the articles from the 2011-2016 period were mostly about Turkey's domestic politics and the rule of the AKP (Cansun and Arik, 2018).…”

A Bibliometric Study on the Publications Investigating Democracy in Turkey

“…We used Excel for basic analyses and AntConc (Anthony, 2019) for corpus analysis of the texts obtained from the keywords and abstracts of the publications. The paper follows the thread of earlier bibliometric political science research focusing mainly on the language of publications, document types and categories, publications years, authors and affiliations, journals, abstracts and keywords (Chi, 2012;Cansun and Arik, 2018;Akboga and Arik, 2017).…”