1951
DOI: 10.1086/266348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political Party Identification and Attitudes Toward Foreign Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
3

Year Published

1977
1977
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is arguably the central concept in the study of electoral behavior and public opinion on partisan questions. Campbell et al defined party identification as a lens affecting voters' perceptions of the political world: ''Identification with a party raises a perceptual screen through which the individual tends to see what is favorable to his partisan orientation '' (1960, 133;Belknap and Campbell 1952). Since then, many studies have applied this concept to explain variation in electoral behavior and public opinion (for a recent review and restatement of the concept see Johnston 2006).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is arguably the central concept in the study of electoral behavior and public opinion on partisan questions. Campbell et al defined party identification as a lens affecting voters' perceptions of the political world: ''Identification with a party raises a perceptual screen through which the individual tends to see what is favorable to his partisan orientation '' (1960, 133;Belknap and Campbell 1952). Since then, many studies have applied this concept to explain variation in electoral behavior and public opinion (for a recent review and restatement of the concept see Johnston 2006).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For reasons explained in the previous section, identification is unlikely to occur as it requires long-term stability and loyalty. Party identification has received considerable attention as determinant of the vote choice (Belknap and Campbell 1952, Miller 1952, Burdick and Brodbeck 1959, Campbell et al 1960, Converse 1962. Two possible interpretations of the concept are available.…”
Section: Party Preferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Berelson, Lazarsfeld, and McPhee (1954), Key (1961:65-66), Key and Munger (1959), Lane (1959), and Lane and Sears (1964). For earlier work by members of the Michigan school that uses the concept, see Belknap and Campbell (1951-52) andCampbell, Gurin, and Miller (1954). Key and Lane may be said to have joined with Campbell, Converse, Miller, and Stokes to establish the "behavioralist" mode of studying American political behavior.…”
Section: Standard-nutzungsbedingungenmentioning
confidence: 99%