2017
DOI: 10.1177/1354068817715552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political parties, formal selection criteria, and gendered parliamentary representation

Abstract: Political parties sometimes set up formal criteria to define the pool of potential candidates. This article represents the first large-scale comparative analysis of potential unintended gendered consequences of these formal selection criteria for parliamentary representation. Using unique data on 101 political parties in 32 African, Asian, and postcommunist European countries, we find that there is indeed a relationship between formal selection criteria and men’s and women’s political representation. Criteria … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Protection from legal sanction, however, points to a wider issue: the critical importance of building trust in the context of clientelist politics (e.g. Bjarnegård, 2010: 184). It is not simply that political actors who rely on the informal distribution of patronage must fear law enforcement; they also know that the informal deals they make cannot be enforced legally and are thus constantly at risk of being dishonoured by their own allies and collaborators.…”
Section: Conceptualising and Explaining Political Families And Dynastiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protection from legal sanction, however, points to a wider issue: the critical importance of building trust in the context of clientelist politics (e.g. Bjarnegård, 2010: 184). It is not simply that political actors who rely on the informal distribution of patronage must fear law enforcement; they also know that the informal deals they make cannot be enforced legally and are thus constantly at risk of being dishonoured by their own allies and collaborators.…”
Section: Conceptualising and Explaining Political Families And Dynastiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, discrimination may be largely or entirely unintentional on the part of recruiters and/or party elites. As these groups are mostly male, similarity of socioeconomic characteristics, attitudes, values, and personalities between this in-group (perceiver) and candidates for promotion may be interpreted as qualifications (Bjarnegård, 2009; Lipman-Blumen, 2000; Piliavin, 1987). In turn, social similarities may lead to an assumption of competence in a way that favors the dominant group (Holgersson, 2003; Klahr, 1969; Schlozman, Burns, Verba, & Donahue, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The article contributes to a growing literature on women candidates and electoral politics that examines the impact of gender quotas for overcoming the complex, social, cultural and institutional obstacles women face in running for political office (Krook, 2009;Norris & Lovenduski, 1995). The article also contributes to emerging research on the impact of party structures on women's representation and the role of political parties in selecting and promoting women candidates (Bjarnegard & Kenny, 2015;Bjarnegard & Zetterberg, 2019;Kenny, 2013). Our findings suggest that traditional women's wings can inhibit women's advancement by peripheralising women's issues, lending qualitative evidentiary support to a recent large-N study of the same problem (Cowell-Meyers & Scott, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%