2006
DOI: 10.1177/0192512106061424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political Knowledge and Electoral Participation in the Netherlands: Comparisons with the Canadian Case

Abstract: Recent research suggests a significant connection between declining voter turnout among younger Canadian cohorts and diminished levels of political knowledge. This article seeks to develop these findings further by drawing contrasts with a country (the Netherlands) that has not witnessed a significant turnout decline among the young to see whether political knowledge levels have likewise remained stable. The results partly confound expectations: as in Canada, a growing knowledge gap between young and old is ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…According to contemporary wisdom, political knowledge “promotes political participation” (Galston, 2001, p. 224), and the same applies to internal political efficacy, as many studies report a positive impact of political efficacy on a range of political activities (Balch, 1974; Steinbrecher, 2009; Vecchione et al, 2014; Verba, Schlozman, & Brady, 1995). While much empirical research was concerned with voting behaviour, showing that political knowledge increases the likelihood to vote (e.g., Amadeo, Torney-Purta, Lehmann, Husfeldt, & Nikolova, 2002; Delli Carpini & Keeter, 1996; Howe, 2006; Krampen, 2000b), research has also focused on other kinds of political participation, however. On the one hand, scholars find the influence of political knowledge to be smaller with respect to other political activities (Milner, 2007; Oesterreich, 2003), and others even suggest that internal political efficacy might be the more robust predictor of unconventional political activities in comparison to the impact of political knowledge (Kuhn, 2006; Schulz et al, 2010).…”
Section: Political Knowledge Internal Political Efficacy and Politicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to contemporary wisdom, political knowledge “promotes political participation” (Galston, 2001, p. 224), and the same applies to internal political efficacy, as many studies report a positive impact of political efficacy on a range of political activities (Balch, 1974; Steinbrecher, 2009; Vecchione et al, 2014; Verba, Schlozman, & Brady, 1995). While much empirical research was concerned with voting behaviour, showing that political knowledge increases the likelihood to vote (e.g., Amadeo, Torney-Purta, Lehmann, Husfeldt, & Nikolova, 2002; Delli Carpini & Keeter, 1996; Howe, 2006; Krampen, 2000b), research has also focused on other kinds of political participation, however. On the one hand, scholars find the influence of political knowledge to be smaller with respect to other political activities (Milner, 2007; Oesterreich, 2003), and others even suggest that internal political efficacy might be the more robust predictor of unconventional political activities in comparison to the impact of political knowledge (Kuhn, 2006; Schulz et al, 2010).…”
Section: Political Knowledge Internal Political Efficacy and Politicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of informed citizens for the performance and implementation of democracy has stimulated a lot of research on political knowledge. Research on political knowledge has tried to explain its occurrence (both in relation to individual and structural variables); 9 its distribution with respect to gender; 10 its impact on voter turnout and political participation; 11 and tried to determine the consequences of a lack of well-informed citizens. 12 Cognitive functions and the ability to process information are central to amassing and processing political knowledge, and by extension the practice of your citizenship.…”
Section: Crime and Political Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiné studie pak zkoumají, jak politická znalost ovlivňuje další chování jedince, zejména jeho participaci na politických aktivitách (např. Jung, Kim a de Zuñiga 2011 ;Milner 2002;Howe 2006), ve volebním chování (Gomez, Wilson 2001; Singh a Roy 2014; Marquis 2010) a také v tvorbě veřejného mínění a smýšlení o tématech (Althaus 1998;Delli Carpini a Keeter 1996;Rapeli 2014;Fishkin 1994). Tento text se řadí k druhému typu.…”
Section: úVodunclassified