Austerity politics, war at the borders of the European Union, the rise of nationalisms, populist parties in Europe, islamophobia, and the refugee crisis, call for discussions about the theories and concepts that academic disciplines provide for making sense of the societal, cultural and political transformations of the time. Such undertakings need to avoid the tendency within increasingly professionalized disciplines to become self-referential, thus narrowing their analytical and imaginative capacities (Brown, 2002). In this article, we focus on the capacities of feminist political analysis to undertake these tasks. By political analysis-borrowing from Colin Hay (2002)-we mean the diversity of analytical strategies developed around 'the political'. Since the political has to do with the 'distribution, exercise, and consequences of power', political analysis focuses on the analysis of 'power relations' (Hay, 2002: 3) and the contestations arising around them. Gender and politics has become a vibrant subfield of political science. Feminist approaches to political analysis applied and developed in this subfield, explore, first, how power relations are gendered since they reproduce gender norms and biases that create hierarchies between women and men (Hawkesworth, 1994). Secondly, feminist approaches show how 'the political' includes gender issues formerly considered 'personal' (Pateman, 1983). This thinking often implies a personal commitment to the political project of gender equality that moves feminist scholars to link theory and practice in their daily work (Celis et al., 2013). The interest in transformative political praxis marks feminist political analysis as both an empirical and normative project. At the same time, feminist analyses have their limitations, which This is the post version of the article, which has been published in Feminist Theory. 2017, 18(3),