2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfi.2019.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political interference and crowding out in bank lending

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results on elections captures as political business cycle has a significant positive effect on corporate and commercial loans and consumer and retail loans in Africa. Following the literature on political business cycle, the results confirms the argument that banks tend to advance more loans during electioneering periods due to political power and influence (Kumar, 2020; Englmaier and Stowasser, 2017). Finally, business extent of disclosure which measures the degree of transparency in the corporate world shows a positive significant effect on corporate and commercial loans while having a negative significant effect on consumer and retail loans and other loan types.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The results on elections captures as political business cycle has a significant positive effect on corporate and commercial loans and consumer and retail loans in Africa. Following the literature on political business cycle, the results confirms the argument that banks tend to advance more loans during electioneering periods due to political power and influence (Kumar, 2020; Englmaier and Stowasser, 2017). Finally, business extent of disclosure which measures the degree of transparency in the corporate world shows a positive significant effect on corporate and commercial loans while having a negative significant effect on consumer and retail loans and other loan types.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In addition authors like (Behr, Norden, & Noth, 2013;Ge, et al, 2018;George & Georgios, 2017;Guirguis, 2018;Włodarczyk et al, 2019) explore the financial constraints for private business firms and behavior of bank lending. Some other authors also show their significant interest towards the bank lending & country factors (Barrell & Nahhas, 2019), local and global bank lending (Vause & von Peter, 2011), learning through lending by banks (Botsch & Vanasco, 2019;Cohen, 1983;Darmouni & Sutherland, 2018;Jones, 2007;Koford & Tschoegl, 1999;Malekipirbazari & Aksakalli, 2015;Modarres, Ibrahim, Louie, & Paisley, 2018), quality of capital, bank lending and financial crisis (Cowling, Marlow, & Liu, 2019;Illes, Lombardi, & Mizen, 2015;Košak, Li, Lončarski, & Marinč, 2015;Puddu & Waelchli, 2015), crowding out, political interference and bank lending (Kumar, 2019;Gyebi et al, 2013;Handa, 2018;Chang'ach, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper, therefore, adds to prior microeconomic evidence of the resource dependency hypothesis and might facilitate the design of effective policies. Understanding how policies can be better tailored to reverse these adverse consequences of electoral cycles comprise ideas for future research (Demirgüç-Kunt & Huizinga, 2010;Laeven & Levine, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%